Hey everyone, as you know, the Aremis 2
mission has completed its manned trip
around the moon and returned safely to
Earth. Some people watched every second
in complete awe. Others barely noticed.
But dare I say, nobody has been more
obsessed with this mission than
flatearthers, who, against all logic,
continue to exist. Let's check in with
these dorks, shall we? Artemis 2 is
getting a lot of attention because it's
the farthest humans have ever been from
Earth, just barely edging past the
previous record from Apollo 13. It's
also the first time humans have been to
deep space since the Apollo missions,
setting the stage for an upcoming lunar
landing, followed by the initial stages
of establishing a permanent lunar base.
It's all very awesome, and I'm going to
talk about some future projections for
the Aremis program in another video.
Right now, we are just going to focus on
making fun of the dumbest people alive,
flat-earthers. Flatearthers are the
whiniest, most intellectually bankrupt
toddlers on this entire spherical
planet. They whine and whine and whine
about how nobody can go to Antarctica
because the government NASA Jew penguins
will get you. They puff up their chests
and brag about how badly they want to go
to Antarctica to disprove the 24-hour
sun and obliterate the globe deception.
Um, well, why can't I? It's similar to
like Antarctica. But why can't I go see
for myself? Why are you just telling me,
"Oh, it's a globe. It's a little
continent on the bottom. You don't fall
off because of gravity. You're good.
Don't bother going there." Well, why
can't I go and see? And then when
somebody offers to take them there for
free, they have a contest for who can be
the most cowardly hypocritical little
[\h__\h] in human history, declining the
offer one by one. Except of course for
Jiren Campanella, who is no longer a
flat-earther, and Austin Witset, who
seems to not be particularly active
lately, so I don't know what his deal is
now and refused to investigate for even
10 seconds. All the rest sat in their
mom's basement eating Cheetos and
laughing about how fake the not at all
fake trip was. a debacle which I covered
over two of the funniest videos on my
entire channel. So, be sure to watch
those if you haven't yet. Well, it seems
that history is repeating itself because
another super duper crazy impossible
thing that absolutely could never happen
definitely did just happen. And once
again, all of it is fake NASA CGI
Illuminati blackmagic because they say
so. And just like with the Antarctica
trip, the Aremis 2 mission has provided
hours and hours of new footage and
thousands of images and all kinds of
other stuff for them to perform endless
mental gymnastics to try and deny. Live
footage from launch all the way up to
Earth orbit. Stunning images of the moon
and Earth from deep space. It's a giant
goodie bag of treats they desperately
have to deal with. And as you can
imagine, it's extremely hilarious to
watch them do that. So, let's get
started right after a quick word from
today's sponsor. As you know, my
debunking activity attracts attention
from hordes of trolls as well as
complete psychopaths. Take a look at
this guy. He sure likes to talk about
me. Some compliments, perhaps.
>> Your cult. You're [\h__\h] scientism,
cult, [\h__\h] I'll [\h__\h] kill you.
>> Whoa, but he's not crazy enough to
follow through, right?
>> Well, I stand corrected. You think I
want maniacs like that to find my phone
number or my home address? You bet your
sweet tits I don't. That's why I use
Incogn. Incogn scour the internet for
data brokers who collect and trade your
personal information without you
knowing. Finding them all and demanding
your privacy would take forever if they
even comply. So why not let the
professionals do it for you? Go to
incogn.com/professor
and use code professor Dave to get an
exclusive offer of 60% off. Incogn will
find every last one of these data
brokers and make sure that all your
information from your name, address, and
phone number to social security number,
medical data, and even shopping habits
remain completely private. The best part
is that this activity is constant, so
you can rest easy knowing that any new
breaches that crop up will be dealt with
swiftly and efficiently. And you can
keep track of all this progress in your
own personalized dashboard, which tells
you the number of hits and how many
they've been able to remove. Be sure to
also check out Incogn's new custom
removal feature under the unlimited and
family unlimited plans. This allows you
to submit an unlimited number of
specific links for immediate removal for
a level of protection beyond the
standard plan. Keep stalkers away. Stop
employers from accessing your
information without consent. You name
it. So don't wait another minute. Go to
incogn.com/professor
Dave and use code professor Dave for a
whopping 60% off. Incogn helps wipe
yourself from the internet completely.
They can't harm you if they can't find
you. Click on the link below to claim
your 60% off and get your personal data
off the market. Okay, first up in this
deep space damage control cope session,
we have the sickly inbred prince of flat
earth himself, Eric Dubet. Sorry, Eric
Dubich. I almost forgot. He's going to
hoist himself up off of his yoga mat
where he's been filating himself since
turning down the Antarctica trip and
debunk this stupid Artemis mission. Or
at least he's going to give it the old
college try. Let's see what he can
muster.
>> On April Fool's Day, NASA officially
launched their Artemis 2 rocket,
claiming to take humans back to the moon
in 2026.
Going back to the moon, however, would
require us having actually gone there
before, which myself and many other
researchers have debunked beyond any
shadow of a doubt in several previous
videos, showing that the original NASA
moon landings were faked in a studio on
Earth. I still get whiplash anytime
these [\h__\h] refer to themselves as
researchers. It just has that adorable,
"Look at me, I'm a superhero," energy
that little kids on the playground have.
Anyway, no, Eric, you definitely did not
do that. The footage from the Apollo
missions was impossible to fake. There
is no way to evenly illuminate the
entire lunar surface with a single light
other than by the sun. I've covered this
in detail in my two-part series
debunking the crap out of Bart Cbril,
the premier moon landing denier. So, go
check those out if you miss them and
want to learn about how any of these
ridiculous talking points regarding
shadows or whatever the hell else they
bring up are mind-numbingly stupid. The
shadows can't be faked. The dust from
the lunar rover falling precisely as it
would in a vacuum under 16th Earth
gravity can't be faked. None of it was
faked. Moving on. Did you know that NASA
is the world's largest purchaser of
helium? Helium is a stable and very
light element used for sending balloons
up into high altitude. NASA admittedly
uses large amounts of helium to send up
its sataloons.
>> Sataloons? How cute. Hey, [\h__\h] You
know that you can see the ISS from the
ground with the naked eye, right? Plenty
of people have taken pictures of it.
What a shocker. No balloons, just a
satellite whizzing around the entire
planet every 90 minutes.
>> But what about these rockets? Look at
this image of the Aremis 2 live on Fox
News. What does that look like to you?
Honestly looking without bias, doesn't
that look like a giant inflatable blowup
toy?
>> No, it honestly does not. It looks like
a [\h__\h] rocket.
>> Once the rocket is out of the public's
view after a couple minutes of genuine
launch footage, true to form, NASA
always switches to CGI.
We can never get full live unedited
video focused straight ahead of the
rocket or with a view focused on Earth.
>> Except for when they did provide
literally exactly that, uncut live
footage from the side of the rocket from
launch all the way up into orbit, which
is not new at all since many SpaceX
launches have also done that. You're
pathetic.
>> Also, where are all the satellites and
stars? There should be tens of thousands
of satellites floating around up there,
but we never see any of them whizzing
by.
>> Uh, space is really big and they
calculate a trajectory on purpose to
avoid hitting any satellites. It's
[\h__\h] NASA, dumbass. I know you've
never met an actual smart person, but
they can do math and [\h__\h] You're
whining about how one of 10,000 phone
booths sized objects doesn't whiz by in
a tiny portion of a volume significantly
larger than the entire Earth. Use your
brain.
>> Another thing I guarantee we won't see
is independent video from people filming
with Super Zoom cameras capturing
Artemis 2 during its slingshot around
the Earth, nor during its trip around
the moon. P900 and P1000 cameras are
able to zoom into the moon with
incredible detail. But I guarantee if we
all train our telescopes and cameras to
the moon when Artemis 2 is supposedly
passing by, not a single person will
capture video of the rocket passing by
the moon. Well, dumbass, the moon is a
gigantic celestial object reflecting
huge amounts of sunlight. And the Orion
spacecraft is a dinky little tin can
that doesn't emit any light at all.
Nevertheless, people have indeed been
able to obtain footage of it using
backyard telescopes. I guess you just
didn't bother to check up on your own
claim. NASA has already started
releasing new Earth images supposedly
taken from Artemis 2, and they are just
as dubious as ever. Again, they are
showing us Earth as a crisp, perfect
circle/ sphere in these images. Yet,
just moments earlier in their live
stream, they were showing video of a
clearly smooshed Earth looking nothing
like the pictures released shortly
after. You're comparing a distorted
freeze frame of GoPro footage to
photographs taken by professional
cameras. You're stupid.
>> So, let's take a closer look at these
images. Where are all the continents?
We are seeing half of the globe in this
image and there is nothing but ocean and
part of Africa. We are supposed to
believe that all of North America, South
America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and
Antarctica are just hiding on the other
50% of the globe. No, it's not ocean and
part of Africa. It's almost all of
Africa, the Atlantic Ocean, as well as
much of South America and part of
Europe. Here's an image showing you the
land masses and approximate orientation
of the picture. South America is
obscured by clouds, but otherwise you
can see a lot of this stuff. Here's
Gibralar leading to Spain and then more
Europe behind the rest of these clouds.
You can also see city lights, the
aurora, even Venus down here. It's a
[\h__\h] incredible picture. But of
course, big brain Eric says it's fake
because NASA dum dums didn't put enough
land in the fake dumb picture. airtight.
>> You can take these new images just
released from NASA and run them through
an advanced AI filter to check for
authenticity and see for yourself. These
images do not even pass AI scans for
authenticity and are all coming back as
confirmed CGI images. People honestly
should be able to discern for themselves
that these Earth images are clearly CGI.
But if you don't trust your own
discernment, even AI is telling you that
these are not real. You got to love the
hypocrisy of idiot flat-earthers telling
us not to trust the big bad government
and big bad SpaceX and all the big bad
money people. But when it comes to AI
that tells you whatever you want to
hear, courtesy of the trillion dollar AI
industry, well, those are just some
straight shooting truth seekers that can
be trusted implicitly, right? Oh, and
don't forget that a bunch of people make
shitty AI images and then flat-earthers
share those either because they're too
stupid to check for a source or because
they're deliberately deceiving their
viewers and pretend they're being
presented by NASA as genuine images.
Welcome to the epistemological breakdown
of the post-truth era, folks. Watching
otherwise intelligent grown adults being
completely duped and stupified by this
propaganda is honestly embarrassing and
pathetic. Stareyed NASA fanboys are so
excited by the prospect of living in
their imagined science fiction Star Trek
future that they cannot see the
deception for what it is. They hear
about building bases on the moon and
sending humans to colonize Mars. And
these ideas implanted by Hollywood, then
fertilized by NASA, have taken such
strong roots in their brains that they
can no longer see the forest for the
trees.
>> Yeah. People only believe things that
Hollywood tells them to believe. Kind of
like how every single one of you ass
hats have brainwashed morons into
thinking they are in a Hollywood movie
called The Matrix and they are super
brave heroes taking red pills and
finding out the awesome truth. Funny how
this logic actually works better on you,
huh? Okay, let's move on from Eric
Dubich and hit our other favorite flirt
ball, David Weiss. You remember him from
when I humiliated him more than anyone
has been humiliated in human history,
right? Great. Let's check out some of
his pathetic damage control.
Look out you guys. Davey is doing some
internet sleuththing. Get to the [\h__\h]
point, Weiss.
Okay, so it's what if they showed us
video of the Earthrise and then He plays
a crappy animation he made himself and
changed Artemis to Fartmus. Holy [\h__\h]
you really got us there, champ. What do
you imagine this tool was trying to
achieve with this? Oh, look at that.
He's hawking detox supplements now.
Let's have a click. Masterpiece. We have
no idea what's in it, but there's a
peace sign and a leaf, so you know it's
good. And it's quite the steal at 60
bucks. I wonder what Dave's cut is. Not
making enough from your shitty flat
earth app to get by, eh, Davey? Okay,
here's another.
>> And in the surprise of the day, we just
came out of an eclipse where the sun
moon and the entire dark moon about that
big right out the window that we were
watching.
Wow, this one is stupid even for him.
Yeah, the moon looks way bigger than the
sun to them, which is why the moon is
able to eclipse the sun. It's able to
block the sun from their viewpoint.
That's called an eclipse. you halfwit.
He genuinely thinks that if it doesn't
look exactly like a solar eclipse looks
on Earth's surface, that it's not called
an eclipse. One thing obscures the light
from another eclipse. That's what the
moon did. They don't have to be the
exact same angular size for it to be
called an eclipse. Here's footage of the
eclipse.
>> Once the moon has completely covered the
sun, they'll be able to take off those
glasses for almost an hour. Totality on
Earth during a solar eclipse lasts only
a couple of minutes. So, this
opportunity gives them a chance to look
out into deep space and to look into see
if there are other planets nearby.
What you're seeing right now is the
solar corona. That's the outer
atmosphere of the sun. And the science
team is very interested in any images
that the crew can capture of this.
The sun went behind the moon. Eclipse.
You can see part of the corona on this
edge of the moon over here as the sun is
going behind the moon. Can you believe
this dumbass actually made a video
that's literally just him admitting he
doesn't know what the word eclipse
means? What else?
That's basically the whole video. It's 1
minute and 44 seconds. He shows an
amazing image from Artemis, puts photo
in quotation marks, and then flashes an
AI photo he made that he pretends is
better even though it's not, and makes
no attempt whatsoever to explain why he
thinks the photo is fake. That's it.
This dumbass isn't even trying anymore.
What else?
Hooray! Another instance of dumb [\h__\h]
flat-earthers not understanding
rotational dynamics. How are these
[\h__\h] still pretending that the earth
is supposed to be spinning super fast?
How is anyone still saying this [\h__\h]
Genuinely, I have to understand how
anyone could still be spewing this
moronic talking point. It spins once a
day. That's what a [\h__\h] day is. So,
the Earth spins once per day,
>> bro.
>> That's what a [\h__\h] day is. Did you
know that?
>> Do you know what a Do you know what a
day means?
It's how it's how long it takes the
Earth to spin around
>> one time.
>> So all of this thousand miles an hour
[\h__\h] just makes you sound like an
idiot because it spins once a day. It
spins at half the rate of the hourhand
on a clock. Not so fast, is it?
>> Wow.
>> Pretty funny [\h__\h] huh?
>> Yeah, really funny.
>> Um, any response?
Yeah, you're you're full of [\h__\h] Um,
>> am I full of [\h__\h] about what a day is?
Is a day 24 hours? What's a day, dude?
Tell me what a day is. Once a day, you
guys, the Earth spins one time in 24
hours. That's half as fast as the hour
hand on a clock. How long did it take to
get this photo? Oh, look at that. A
quarter of a second. So, we took these
two back to back, probably within
seconds of each other. How much farther
away should the Earth look in a couple
seconds, dumbass? How much should the
clouds have moved in a couple seconds,
dumbass? How much should the Earth have
spun in a couple seconds, dumbass?
What's that? A completely negligible
amount is the answer for all three
questions. Then why the [\h__\h] did you
make this video? What else?
Again,
that's literally the whole video. An
empty claim that all this footage of
them in Zerog was filmed on the vomit
comet and then a fake AI image he made
himself turning the spacecraft into a
set. That's the end. These morons have
become what they hate. Shouting fake CGI
at everything that's real while
presenting their own shitty CGI as
though they mean anything. Hey [\h__\h]
on the vomit comet, you get about 30
seconds of weightlessness. This video is
10 uncut minutes broadcast live of the
Aremis crew talking to astronauts on the
ISS. The first ever space-to-pace call.
>> Integrity, this is the International
Space Station. How do you hear?
Hey, International Space Station and
Jessica, we have you loud and clear. How
about us?
>> We have you loud and clear as well. And
we have BME TV up. So, we have a view of
you right now and it is making us so
excited. We feel like you're here with
us and this is really just making our
entire week right now.
We have been waiting for this like you
can't imagine. Let me go check on our
PFD. We are 201,726
now 25 nautical miles from planet Earth,
which is just hard to believe. The
scales are impossible to believe. And
for the run of show this morning, I
figured I'll say a quick hi, which I
have done. I'll hand the microphone to
fellow chump Jeremy. He can say a quick
hi, and then we'll let you three a paws
just get on with it.
10 minutes of this. Everybody waits the
whole time. Of course, this is not even
remotely new. We've seen this from the
ISS for decades. It doesn't mean a thing
to them. They just make up [\h__\h]
about wires or whatever else they can
pull out of their asses as though it's
possible to make balls of water float
around on wires. Honestly, this is all
really pathetic, even for Weiss. The guy
just isn't even [\h__\h] trying anymore.
Do we have anyone else? Do we have some
fresh talent we can mock? How about this
douchebag? Candid Truth. Ooh, he has
truth in the name of his channel, so you
know he's the real deal. Okay, dickbag,
tell us about Artemis 2 fakery exposed
because of a green screen glitch hoax.
>> That organization NASA, the the Hebrew
word for to deceive, to beguile, to
delude, to lead astray. Is that their
old tricks again?
>> NASA is not a word in Hebrew. It's an
acronym. These morons genuinely think
that an organization whose purpose is to
deceive everyone would name themselves
to deceive. But yes, they are indeed up
to their old tricks, sending people into
space. Here is the latest green screen
glitch on Artemis. Check this out. Watch
this little ball. They've been playing
with this little globe head ball
literally. And you see these letters?
You see I N. You can see through this
little ball as it spins and certain
colors begin to show. And you can see
that the green screen or the blue screen
in this case is showing through and
you're actually seeing letters
where it should be blue.
All right, you got someplaining to do. I
got questions. If this is fake, then you
know, point it out to me. Show me where
the original clip is, how this was
edited. Wow. Cookooky stuff. This one
required a quick Googling, which morons
like this will never do. Failed text
overlay from a third party news station
syndicating the NASA feed. The original
official feed does not show this. Well,
just from I overheard from some of the
conferences and then what I uh enjoyed
watching with my family, uh I think
there's a lot going on. Uh it's been
interesting to hear what they have
witnessed on the news and in social
media and but also their launch
experience. I got to hear the first uh
story. See that? Nothing. No letters, no
green screen trickery, just four people
in space. You claim you want to see the
original footage, but it took me
literally 30 seconds to find it, which
means you couldn't take 30 seconds to
fact check this [\h__\h] before making
this dumb video and contributing to
disinformation on the internet. How
embarrassing. Every single example of
some crap like this is always trivially
explainable. So, we don't need to do a
bunch of them. Got anything better?
>> How is it even traveling? There's no
atmosphere to push off of. You can't use
flame thrusters. Do they have just huge
CO2 tanks that are pushing air out? How
is this thing even navigating right now?
>> Yes, he is genuinely doing the what is
it pushing off of thing? Holy [\h__\h]
hell. Hey, dumbass. It's Newton's third
law. For every action, there is an equal
and opposite reaction. Expelling huge
amounts of gas produces forward thrust.
It doesn't have to push off of anything.
Stand on a skateboard and throw a
bowling ball. You'll start to roll. Did
you push off of anything? No. Newton's
third [\h__\h] law. Rockets don't need to
push off of anything. They generate
thrust. Get an education. Should we do
one more from this tool? We're sending
people back to the moon, right? You
believe the first moon landing, right?
1969. You remember that footage? Looked
like a terrible black and white ghostly
footage. And this was a year after
Stanley Cubrick's movie Space Odyssey
2001 that had these amazing, beautiful
graphics, full color. But for some
reason, when we went to the moon, the
the biggest accomplishment in human
history, we had this footage that was
black and white and ghostly and you
could barely even see what was going on.
2001 was a movie, you incompetent
buffoon. A Hollywood feature film. Do
you have any idea what kind of equipment
was used to make that movie? You want
the Apollo astronauts to bring an entire
Hollywood film crew and top-notch
cinematic equipment with them in the
tiny tin can that could barely fit three
people. Are you genuinely this much of a
brain deadad loser? When you look at the
launch itself, this is what you see.
Notice that arc. Where's that arc head?
The moon's right here. You You can
clearly see the moon above it. The ark
is going out somewhere into the ocean.
It looks like because these rockets
never go to space.
>> It's going to Earth orbit, you dumb
piece of [\h__\h] It doesn't just go in a
straight line from the ground to the
moon. First, it goes to orbit, then it
does a trans lunar injection burn to
establish its trajectory to the moon.
There was live footage of them doing all
of this. You could watch them do it. If
you're too lazy to do that, you could
Google it for 5 seconds and learn about
it. But no, we just get Mino understand
how rocket go so it fake. Where the [\h__\h]
is the footage of the rocket coming back
down into the ocean, dumbass? Don't you
think somebody might have seen that?
What about the live footage from the
rocket? We all watched it take off. So
when does that switch to CGI fake
whatever the [\h__\h] you're pretending it
is? Got a moment you can pinpoint?
You're dumber than rocks. You can never
watch a rocket launch and watch it go
straight up and continue to go up into
outer space. Never happens. You can look
this up yourself and you'll see that
every space launch arcs out into the
ocean. The the shortest distance between
two places is a straight line. But, you
know, they're going to tell you, people
in the comments are going to say, "Oh,
you don't understand science. They have
to like orbit the Earth and whip around
and get enough speed to pop out of that
atmosphere." This is insane the stuff
that we believe. Why do we just believe
this stuff? Why do people believe the
very obvious and objectively true
explanation that debunks the dumb [\h__\h]
you just said? Because not everyone has
an IQ below room temperature. that
somehow if you go up high enough that
you just reach this barrier that somehow
you can go through it and pop and
suddenly you're floating in outer space
and you're no longer in Earth's
atmosphere with gravity and all these
things like like there's this bubble
around this earth that we're in somehow
keeping our atmosphere in but we can
actually go through it and not pop the
bubble and you know there's all these
things about Van Allen radiation belts.
And when the astronauts were asked about
it, they were like, "Oh, I don't I don't
know anything about it. Did we go
through?" Yeah, we must have went
through it. Then we went went right
through it. No problems. Nope. Must not
have been. I went right through it. This
is all crazy pseudocience nonsense. It's
a deception. There's no bubble. And
there's no deception. There's nothing to
get through. There's no dome. There's no
brick wall. There's no firmament.
There's no ice shield. It's a [\h__\h]
planet with an atmosphere held by
gravity that dissipates along a gradient
until there's none left. And boom,
you're in space. You're still influenced
by Earth's gravity. You're just in
freefall. So, if your velocity is large
enough, you don't have to expel any
energy to stay up there. Once they're
there, they do safety checks, ensure
they are precisely aligned with the
moon, and then they do the burn and head
to the moon. It's not that [\h__\h] hard
to understand.
>> You start to see the thing lift off,
and you watch it go. Oh, it's going
straight up. Oh, it's it's going towards
space. But what do we see happening
already? I'm already starting to see it
making its way towards 1:00.
Here we go. This is what we see every
time. Oh, now it's going towards 2:00.
I mean, you can even see on this visual
this uh visualization, the CGI
they're showing you. Look at this. We're
at
3:00.
We're
The rocket is going down. The rocket is
now going down. And nobody questions
this. No. People are watching this. They
want to see a rocket go to space. The
rocket's going down, guys. There's a
problem. How the [\h__\h] is it going down,
you [\h__\h] Deviating from straight up
does not equal going down. You strike me
as someone who mixes up left and right
quite a bit. What's poisoned your brain
so badly that you're throwing this
tantrum in the first place? That's
what's coming, guys. Antichrist spirit
is coming to bring about a one world
religion that's all about coexist and
love and unity and tolerance and
acceptance unless you follow the
commandments of God. Then you can't be
tolerated or accepted. If you believe
thus sayeth the Lord, the Bible is true.
Jesus said, "I am the way, not a way,
but the way, the truth, and the life,
you're the problem. You can't be
accepted. you can't be tolerated. So,
tolerance and love for everyone except
for true Christianity. There's a lot of
false Christianity out there. There's a
lot of false Christians who will accept
this deception because they're not
grounded on the rock. They're not
solidified on the word of God. And thus,
they will be deceived by what is soon to
come. Shocking, isn't it? It's funny how
flat-earthers used to be only half
ultra-ligious nut bars while the other
half would actually try to make what
they thought were scientific arguments.
Now it's just nuh-uh and because Bible
says you hate to see the dumbest
community in the entire world get even
dumber. Do we have any other fresh meat?
Here's some guy named vegetable police.
He says NASA faked going to the moon
again. He's actually scraping together
better view counts than the OG bozos. So
let's see if he has a fresh take on this
stuff. It's a little suspicious that you
launched your rocket on April Fool's
Day. That wasn't a question really. I'm
just wondering why you did that. Are we
the joke? It seems like the worst day
possible if you want to be taken
serious.
Why would you do that? Like a clear joke
only they're extending the joke. So it's
like April Fool's week now. That's a
problem. But like that's weird, is it
not? You picked that day. No, it's not
weird. They were going to launch in
February. There were some delays due to
technical issues, and April 1st was the
earliest optimal launch window. NASA is
sending people into space. They don't
give a [\h__\h] about dumb holidays that
don't actually mean anything. If this is
what you're leading with, I shudder to
think about the rest.
>> My second question would be, you posted
a really cool picture. Up until now,
there's not really been an actual photo
of the Earth. It's all composites. NASA
admits this. They say like we can't
actually take a picture, but here's
basically 20 pictures put together and
we added some clouds and stuff. So like
they work on it in Photoshop, but now we
have a picture and they post this thing.
There are countless photos of the Earth
from space [\h__\h] All of the images
from the Apollo missions. The Himawari
satellites have been taking a full image
of Earth every 10 minutes for over a
decade. You have the internet. Use it.
And I'm thinking, okay, nighttime,
dark earth. Okay, can't really tell
much. But the fishy, that's not fishy.
What's fishy is the very same day they
post this image where it's not nighttime
and it's the same damn image. It's all
the clouds are identical, same position.
12. You're trying to tell me 12 hours
later, not one cloud moved on Earth. I
can't believe how many idiots are
fumbling this image again. It's not 12
hours later, you [\h__\h] [\h__\h] It's the
same shot taken again right away, but
with long exposure. This is not
sunlight. This is moonshine. This is the
Earth being illuminated by the moon. You
can see the halo of the sun on the other
side of the Earth. Genius. You can even
see nighttime city lights. Didn't catch
that with your big brain, huh? And it's
not just the clouds that are in the same
spot. It's everything. the continents,
too, because once again, it's the same
shot just brighter because more light is
gathered for the long exposure shot. You
really think NASA is going to fake two
images, say they're 12 hours apart, and
change absolutely nothing about the
positions of everything on Earth, land,
clouds, whatever, and just make the
other one brighter. How dumb are you? I
took that image, downloaded the original
file, uploaded it to the shutter count
file to find out how many pictures have
been taken with that camera. The number,
I don't know if this means anything,
5.565.
For all you number Nazis down there who
like, "Oh my god, that means God, you're
killed by." I was curious and I entered
those into a Gamatria website and I got
some strange phrases.
Don't trust the devil ever, ever, ever,
ever.
That's a little suspicious if I'm being
honest with you. So, I don't know.
>> Oh, he's a numerology lunatic. That
explains a lot. Yes, a random phrase
with an arbitrary number of evers
matches a random number. Holy [\h__\h]
Space must be fake. We found the only
thing dumber than flat earth, guys.
>> It's almost as if there's a dome that a
dog built and we can't get out of it.
Uhoh, your rocket. Instead of doing that
against the dog's dome, it has to curve
and come back down. That's right,
another [\h__\h] pretending that rockets go
up and then come back down right away.
Even though we can all see with the
naked eye that they don't do that, plus
all the uncut live footage of them going
to space. More of this brain rot next
week on episode 429 of idiots denying
what they can see with their own
eyeballs.
>> NASA is going to the moon to invoke.
They're going to You've all heard that
one day coming is an alien invasion. And
that's what kickstarts this whole new
world [\h__\h] that one government,
let's all band together to fight those
guys. So this is maybe we're in those
times right now. NASA is about to go to
the dark side of the moon somehow behind
the dog's dome. Good luck with that.
Going there all of a sudden awakens the
aliens on the dark side and they're
like, "What the hell are you guys doing
here? We told you we had a pact with
your Egyptian ancestors. Never come back
here. We scared you away." And then
they're going to attack Earth with
holograms.
And it's begun. The end is now and save
some rice in your basement cuz we're all
[\h__\h]
>> Okay, it's starting to dawn on me that
this could be parody. Emphasis on could.
He doesn't seem to have a lot of flat
earth or moonlanding denial content, so
I don't really know what this is, but
his viewers are definitely eating it up.
At any rate, let's move on to the final
debacle. Here is Mark Sergeant and David
Weiss doing a live reaction together on
launch day. What a meeting of the minds.
Do you think these two bozos have
anything smart to say? They can't muster
up a single coherent thought, even with
writing and planning involved. Do you
think an off-the- cuff reaction will go
any better?
>> Launch director NTD, our launch team is
ready to proceed at this time.
>> All right, NTD, I copy all. At this
time, I'll perform my poll.
Attention on the net. This is the launch
director performing the final poll for
launch. Verify no constraint. Go for
launch.
>> Yes, Mark. Sending people to the moon
for the first time in 50 years is
slightly dramatic. They have to check a
bunch of [\h__\h] This isn't like driving a
golf cart. Hey, where's Weiss? Finishing
up his shift at the chicken shack.
>> Patient on the short purge. You see
copies?
>> And for all personnel, once we get that
short purge verification,
>> I have never seen a 10-minute counter
take so long to get to. Oh, how can I
not do it live? Actually, it was DJ's
idea.
That's weird. Why don't I see Dave on
the screen?
>> Just wrapping up some final work.
>> Hang on.
I I don't see you on stream. I've got I
see you in my window, but I don't see
you in the screen. One sec.
>> For the ground launch sequencer operator
>> to go ahead and start.
>> Dave, is your microphone on?
>> Toggle toggle your microphone. That is
weird. I see you in stream. I do not see
you on the live control system in the
firing room. Acts like a conductor of an
orchestra.
>> What happened?
>> Executing hundreds of commands and
precisely.
>> I mean, you see me, right? You see me in
StreamYard. Yeah. Toggle your
microphone.
>> It's all autonomous.
>> Entity CCL 212 short perit.
>> Copy that.
>> Could Dave's grandson come out here and
help him figure out his gear? Mark is
over there whining about how launching a
rocket into space takes too long while
his partner in crime can't even join a
live stream in under 10 minutes.
>> I mean, you saw how many people watched
the Katy Perry launch, right? And that
thing was just dissected and instantly.
>> This has so many people looking at it.
>> Look, there there's always going to be
animals. So, they have a bird. They have
a fake bird flying through the scene
right now.
>> Oh, yeah. On the rocket.
>> Wait, was that a bird or a helicopter?
>> It's a bird. We are counting down
>> another. And here comes another another
one.
>> What are big birds doing in there?
>> Well, they they got to put them in big
enough because they they it otherwise
>> I didn't have it on my bingo card that
we would see flat earth crossover with
the birds aren't real satirical
conspiracy, but nothing surprises me
these days. Birds are fake because Dave
says so. Incredible.
>> Again, reiterate some of the points Dave
knows them very well from last night,
which is okay, you're you're doing this.
What sort of shielding are you using to
get through the Van Allen radiation
belts? You don't have any lead or gold
or a whole bunch of water protecting
that capsule. You're going to and from
the moon. None of these morons will ever
learn a single thing about radiation.
They don't know what radiation is. They
don't know that there are different
types of radiation. They don't know what
type of radiation comprises the Van
Allen belts. They think it's literally
X-rays. It's not. X-rays are photons.
Magnetic fields capture massive
electrically charged particles. High
energy protons in the Van Allen belts
are blocked easily by a sheet of paper.
The Apollo missions shielded the
astronauts just fine with two thin
layers of aluminum. The Orion spacecraft
has slightly better shielding material
than the Apollo missions, so they are in
zero danger from the Van Allen belt. I
don't know how many times this has to be
explained to you dinguses
>> or the ridiculousness of putting four
people in that basically is an SUV for
10 days straight without them killing
each other.
>> Well, Mark, most people aren't
insufferable pieces of [\h__\h] like you.
I'm sure that everyone you meet wants to
kill you within 3 days of knowing you,
but some people are pleasant,
intelligent, compassionate people that
are able to make friends and sustain
relationships. You should give it a
shot.
>> How much oxygen you taking? How much
nitrogen are you taking?
>> Wait, you're going to be at there for 10
days?
>> 5 days each way.
>> That's That's standard moon mission
stuff, by the way.
>> Holy [\h__\h] They have to bring oxygen
with them 10 days worth for the purpose
of breathing. Did those nerds at NASA
even think about that? Did they remember
about breathing? This is so stupid that
it doesn't even merit a response.
>> What if uh what if it blows up and they
blame it on the Iranians? Oh yeah, we
talked about that last night. I that
wasn't even one of my top five options
and that's not that's not outside of the
realm and you know it.
>> Yes, they are going to blow up a rocket
with a missile and blame it on Iran.
That's totally one of the top five
possibilities for how NASA is going to
trick the sheeple and pass off this
ridiculous space deception, says the
idiot fraud. 5 minutes before a rocket
is about to go to space and bring people
to the moon and back with no problems.
>> Mark, what was the date of the year? the
the date and well what was the date that
the first photo of the earth was was
given to the American people by NASA
>> coming up in about 20 seconds
>> uh the first blue marble shot was Apollo
17 and it was 1972
>> but what was the date what was the day
of the month
>> April 1st
>> was it April 1st when they came
>> oh wow
>> these dumb [\h__\h] in their obsession with
April 1 [\h__\h] the first picture of
the earth from space was taken in 1946
before NASA existed. NASA's first image
of the Earth from space was taken in
1959. And of course, every single Apollo
mission that went to the moon, whether
landing on the surface or not, got tons
of images of the whole Earth from deep
space. You're pretending an image from
Apollo 17, the final Apollo mission, is
NASA's first image of the Earth from
space because you're disingenuous and
stupid.
>> Say, "Oh, congratulations.
>> Look at Look at those. Look at the
>> I know.
>> Look at the Look at the Look at the the
thing that's moving there.
>> I know.
>> It's like a cushion.
>> It's like baggy pants.
>> I know.
>> Here come the science illiterate morons
critiquing the composition of the rocket
that goes to space. This part moves.
This part allows for movement. What the
[\h__\h] is the problem, [\h__\h]
>> And they just dismiss the fact it's like
50 54
years 54 years. Nothing's happened in
this in this arena and and they just
wave it off. It's like, well, it's too
expensive. Well, it's this and it's like
2026 now we're doing this. Why? You know
why? It's America 250. Nothing has
happened in the space arena in 54 years.
That's funny. I was pretty sure we
launched two Voyager probes and the
International Space Station and the
Hubble telescope and landed a bunch of
rovers on Mars and landed probes on
Venus and Titan and multiple asteroids
and multiple comets and sent other
probes to fly by every other [\h__\h]
planet in the solar system. But no, I
must have been hallucinating all that
[\h__\h] Anyway, we're doing this now
because why? Because why the [\h__\h] not?
Why did we do the Apollo missions? Why
do we do anything? I don't know, man.
Some people have the balls to do things,
unlike you two losers, sitting on your
asses and denying the achievements of
people who actually matter. Hopefully,
you're both still alive when a lunar
base is established, and you can spend
your final days on life support,
desperately debunking the 247 live feed
from the moon.
>> And lifttoff.
>> One,
>> the crew of 2.
Humanity's next great voyage begin.
>> Four,
five,
six.
Roger. Roll pitch.
>> Seven.
>> Houston.
What's your
>> over?
Whatever. I said six.
>> Oh,
>> what was that glitch? Eight. Look how
low it is now. Wait, the height is
wrong. This [\h__\h] is counting the number
of cuts to different angles as though
that makes this fake. A thing that
countless people are watching on many
different live feeds as well as
thousands in person. He's pretending
it's fake because they switch angles a
bunch. Astounding.
>> Why is there a smoke trail on this one
and other ones there is no smoke trail?
>> Is 14 miles in altitude, 8 miles
downrange, traveling more than 2600 mph.
>> The number of edits that we've had
already
during the review of this.
>> Of course, this is just the beginning
because once they get to a certain
point, they're going to have to cut to
the interior camera feeds. Now look at
look how how fast the rocket's moving
compared to the smoke in the air. That
thing's going like 30 miles hour.
I have a solid rocket booster separation
expected at the 2 minute.
>> It's already going across.
>> We see throttle down.
>> It's just so pathetic. They're trying so
hard to have anything to say and they
just don't. Why a smoke trail that's
different? It isn't. Look how slow it
go. It's going thousands of miles an
hour. It's going across. It's going into
orbit. Why did you decide to do this,
guys?
>> Yeah, the uh the side rockets have
dropped. By the way, where's our where's
our side rocket footage? You remember
that from back in the day?
>> The side rockets don't turn off. How
come they're not like spinning out of
control?
>> Spinning out of control? The fuel is
used up. They're not firing anymore.
They're just dead weight plummeting back
to Earth. A small child could understand
this.
>> Why do the side rockets look higher?
stage confirmed in a ready state. Head
of service module fairing separation.
>> Don't know.
>> We're watching a cartoon at this point,
I think.
>> Well, at this point, it's like, why are
you why are they lingering on that shot?
They had the the shot was the one that
was 20 seconds ago. That shot.
>> Weiss says it's a cartoon. The continued
footage of a rocket going to space,
which thousands of people are watching
with their own eyeballs, is now somehow
a cartoon because he says so. Well, now
we have footage from the side of the
rocket, a thing they all pretend doesn't
exist. How are they going to spend this?
I've got a billion dollars on NASA fake
CGI because they say so.
>> Now passing 5,000 miles.
>> That's the shot they should stay on,
right?
>> Wait a minute. That's where they are
now?
>> Yep.
>> That's the shot.
>> Freak out of here.
>> Oh, we are going to have so much fun
with this tomorrow.
>> Oh my lord.
>> Why don't you have some fun with it now,
boys? That's footage from the side of a
rocket going to space. Giggling like
school girls is not an argument. What's
fake about this? Want to try saying
literally anything?
>> Don't know what we're looking at.
>> All of these people here, if these are
just real people, if this is a real
shot,
>> yeah, they saw a rocket shoot up.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, 10 miles away.
>> Let me look at the telemetry on this.
What are we looking at
to verify accuracy?
>> Ah, pulled it off the screen. Hold on,
guys. Let me squint real hard and
pretend to know what these numbers mean.
Oh, they're gone. Great. I wasn't coming
up with anything to say that would sound
convincing. Boy, you can't fake that,
Mark.
>> Nope.
>> You know the disappointing There's a
couple disappointing stuff I can already
tell you in advance because they have
to.
>> What is that? What is that?
>> I I'm not sure.
>> Approaching five minutes. Commander Reed
Wisman confirms
>> neither of us know what any of this [\h__\h]
even is, but it's all fake because we
say so. This is the entire video.
>> What is that supposed to?
>> And now here you go. This is what you
wanted right here. Now we cut to the
animation. I think we were in a
>> minute mark.
>> NASA did they use animation for the shot
that they can't film just so they can
>> Yeah, there isn't a second rocket flying
alongside the first one to get a
cinematic shot of the rocket exiting
Earth's atmosphere. So they make an
animation for our enjoyment. What's the
problem, guys? They have cameras on the
rocket, but you call all that footage
fake. So, what the [\h__\h] are you looking
for?
>> I mean, what a great start.
>> By the way, I love that they keep
talking. They keep using like moments
like, "Oh, this has never been done."
And and this the first time they're
doing this and that. I'm going,
>> "Where are you even what what world are
you living in?" Because they supposedly
did this multiple times all the way up
to Apollo 17.
>> Nobody said we've never done this
before. She said they're going to see
parts of the moon that have never been
seen. That's true. You're either
deliberately distorting what she said or
you're too stupid to understand it.
>> They they had a contest with all these
grade schools in the country to see
which which one was going to get the
mascot for their fluffy little stuffed
toy thing they were going to bring up
with them. That's like, yep, you hook
them. You hook them early. NASA always
goes after the grade schools because
when you tell them it's like, "Oh,
NASA's your friend. Thumbs up." Then you
know they get invested.
>> Oh no. NASA is inspiring kids to be
interested in STEM, which is really easy
to do for them since space travel is
awesome. What are we going to do?
>> We've got still to this day, it's never
happened. It's never going to happen, of
a capsule that goes from out of Earth
orbit and pointing back at the Earth,
showing the Earth turn into a globe.
Never happened. Never going to happen.
>> Trolls.
>> Every single Apollo mission did that.
You call it all fake because you're
stupid. You just call everything fake.
Everything that proves you wrong is fake
because you say so. That's your entire
identity. So, I don't know why you keep
asking for things that already exist and
that you just call fake anyway, no
matter what.
>> No exterior shots.
>> Nothing. That's all we have. This is the
best they can show us right now. Think
of that.
>> So many people would have to be lying.
Why would they lie?
>> You're seeing from our aero
visualization at uh
>> they have showed multiple exterior
shots. They show all kinds of [\h__\h] like
that. You just call it fake. This is
getting really boring, guys.
>> I see that flight plan. It reminds me of
something. I don't know what though.
>> Yeah. Well, it's the Apollo flight plan.
So,
>> yeah, the actual Apollo flight plan.
>> I don't think we didn't even make that
image. I think that's actually a
>> That's from NASA.
>> Space plane looked like Dick and Balls.
>> Okay. So,
>> we're gonna we're gonna wrap this thing
up. Uh I'll let Dave go here in a sec.
Uh just so you guys know, yeah, we're
we're the fact that the counter stopped
in the corner. They're not even doing
the counter anymore because what's the
point? Uh it was what we expected.
Actually worse than what I expected. The
the edits were were quick. There were
glitches. And now we're we're seeing
nothing. Um nothing from the astronauts.
I'm sure they're trying to figure out
how to set that up. No external cameras.
To this day, again, we there has never
been a launch gone out of orbit from
Earth that has ever pointed back on the
Earth in any sort of time lapse. Don't
know why.
>> Yes, it was worse than all of us
expected. It's a full hour of nu and
chuckle fits from the most pathetic
adult toddlers on the internet. Mark
doesn't know why a rocket doesn't go up
to Earth orbit and then point itself
back down towards the ground to get a
picture. Gee, maybe because it would
then fall back down to Earth and you'd
just call the images fake anyway, just
like you do to the perfectly good
footage that they get from the side of
the rocket that you already saw and are
now pretending didn't happen. Pathetic.
Anyway, that'll about do it. The days of
flat-earthers trying to come up with
elaborate pseudocientific explanations
for things are long gone. No more coffee
cup costics or laser experiments or
electric gravity nonsense. They just
watch actual space travel happening in
real time. [\h__\h] their pants and
humiliate themselves by refusing to
Google literally anything for even 10
seconds. It really is tragic. But are we
really that surprised? They're
flat-earthers. They make run-of-the-mill
moonlanding deniers like Bart CBL look
like geniuses. But we can thank them as
always for the gift of laughter, which
is just as priceless as the bravery of
these Artemis astronauts and all the
others to come. So that's it for this
installment of laughing at the dumbest
people alive, flatearthers. It takes a
lot for me to dumpster dive with
flat-earth reactions these days, but
this one was worth it. And Artemis 2 has
indeed been a gold mine, both in terms
of amazing images and endless
opportunities to mock science denying
losers. What will these jerks pivot to
next? If it's hilarious enough, I'll be
sure to fill you in. Until next time.