Hey everyone. Many of you are aware of
my distaste for the Weinstein brothers,
the most insufferable pseudointellectual
douchebags on the planet, whose entire
purpose in life is to enrich themselves
by spreading lies on podcasts. Today, we
have an opportunity to make fun of big
bro Eric some more. So, let's get to it.
If you're new to my channel or generally
unfamiliar with these boners, check out
my playlist on them so you can see how
deep the rabbit hole goes. Once
champions of the so-called intellectual
dark web, they have done quite a lot of
societal harm. Brett spreads medical
misinformation that kills people and
Eric is a major figure in the academia
bad private sector good propaganda
landscape that aligns with the shift
towards fascism we are seeing in this
administration. On the bright side, the
influence these bozos wield has dwindled
quite a bit lately. It's commonly known
that Brett is always lying about
vaccines or Ivormectin or whatever dumb
thing he's grifting on at any given
time. This goes even more so for Eric
because his bloated bloations are even
more transparently baseless and most
people don't put an ounce of stock in
his ramblings anymore. I can't take sole
credit for this, but I do believe my
content has pushed the needle measurably
in helping people see what a pathetic
fraud he is. From my first video on both
brothers exposing his fake theory and
toxic behavior to the whole debacle
surrounding him on Piers Morgan with
Shawn Carroll and the bonus episode of
Sabina Hassenfelder humiliating herself
by coming to his defense. Peter Teal's
favorite media puppet is not well
regarded even amongst the delusional
podcast bro viewership that once
championed him. This spells out a severe
existential crisis for Eric. This is all
he has. Despite his fervent cosplaying,
he's not a scientist. He's not a
mathematician. He's not an economist.
He's not anything. His entire identity
is some guy who spews pseudointellectual
[\h__\h] on podcasts to polarize the
public against academics and legitimate
sources of information. If people no
longer care about what he has to say, he
becomes meaningless. And believe me,
he's received the memo. But Eric doesn't
go down without a fight. And he has one
powerful ally he can call upon in this
time of need. And that is who the hell
else, Joe Rogan. Joe almost
single-handedly created this monster.
And he's not going to leave Eric high
and dry. Joe invited Eric on his show
recently for yet another three-hour
turdfest, and Eric was so manic and
unintelligible that even Joe seemed to
be at a loss for how to greenlight the
constant tsunami of excrement coming his
way. But that only spells amusement for
the rest of us. So today, let's sift
through this episode for some gems. We
won't have to reiterate previous content
explaining how geometric unity is a fake
theory that he uses to trick lay people
into thinking he's a genius. That's a
given after having been exposed by the
real academics he's been hiding from.
And considering how all over the place
Eric is in the episode, it seems like he
knows the curtain has fallen on that
venture. But there are still countless
opportunities for Eric to wedge himself
into current events, pretending to be
relevant and adjacent to anything and
everything. like the [\h__\h] Forest Gump
of the Conspiratorial podcast universe.
And witnessing it is equal parts
hilarious and tragic, like watching a
slow motion train wreck on the Muppet
Express. So, with the relevant context
covered, let's make fun of Eric on Joe
Rogan. Right after a quick word from
today's sponsor, Incogn. As you all
know, my debunking activity attracts a
lot of hatred. Of course, there are
thousands of angry trolls like this.
>> You're [\h__\h] scientism, cult, [\h__\h]
I'll [\h__\h] kill you. But the higherups
who pedal the propaganda hate me, too.
How long until Peter Teal decides he'd
like to send a Palunteer drone to strike
me from above? I value my privacy.
That's why I use Incogn. Incogn scour
the internet for data brokers who
collect and trade your personal
information without you knowing. Finding
them all and demanding your privacy
would take forever, if they even comply.
So, why not let the professionals do it
for you? Go to incogn.com/professor
Dave and use code professor Dave to get
an exclusive offer of 60% off. Incogn
will find every last one of these data
brokers and make sure that all your
information from your name, address, and
phone number to social security number,
medical data, and even shopping habits
remain completely private. The best part
is that this activity is constant. So,
you can rest easy knowing that any new
breaches that crop up will be dealt with
swiftly and efficiently. And you can
keep track of all this progress in your
own personalized dashboard, which tells
you the number of hits and how many
they've been able to remove. Be sure to
also check out Incogn's new custom
removal feature under the unlimited and
family unlimited plans. This allows you
to submit an unlimited number of
specific links for immediate removal for
a level of protection beyond the
standard plan. Keep stalkers away. Stop
employers from accessing your
information without consent. You name
it. So don't wait another minute. Go to
incogn.com/professor
Dave and use code professor Dave for a
whopping 60% off. Incogn helps wipe
yourself from the internet completely.
They can't harm you if they can't find
you. Click on the link below to claim
your 60% off and get your personal data
off the market. What do you do? Are you
more comfortable? You got a nice head of
hair. What?
>> Like for me it doesn't matter. I feel
bad when people like work on their hair
real good like especially ladies and
they get it all nice and then they have
to [\h__\h] smush it with this thing.
>> Okay. If you ever have that kind of
consideration for me, I'm going to be
very disappointed. I thought we were
closer.
>> Some people worry about that.
>> No, I worry about the the gray
>> that you have gray in your hair.
>> It's Yeah. Look at
>> Well, you're like pretty dark for your
age. How old are you now?
>> 60.
>> Yeah, you're you have [\h__\h] dark ass
hair for your age.
>> Look, I'm going to give Eric the benefit
of the doubt and presume that his hair
isn't a wig. It just looks like one. But
even if it's real hair, he's very
obviously been coloring it for decades.
The pageantry of Joe and Eric going back
and forth pretending that this is his
natural hair color while we all sit here
with our eyes rolling out of their
sockets serves as the perfect symbol for
the astronomical levels of delusion that
are going to be enacted for the next 3
hours.
>> How was your uh your what what what was
it exactly? How would you describe it?
speech uh pres
>> a talk on dark energy uh to the uh carch
group at the ut Texas Austin physics
department.
>> This is one I wanted to ask you about
Mitchioaku has been saying that he
believes that dark energy is possibly
something leaking in from another
dimension. Is that look at that face?
Look at that.
Of course, Eric the not a physicist gave
a talk on dark energy which he doesn't
know anything about. And Joe's first
question is about something that former
physicist turned popsai crackpot
Mitchioaku said about another dimension
because to Joe that means a separate
magic realm like the twilight zone. Who
needs academics when you have this kind
of intellectual banter? Am I right?
>> Me [\h__\h] is doing a tremendous amount of
damage to theoretical physics. How so?
Um,
theoretical physics is in my estimation
the most beautiful, most powerful, most
economically potent thing you can do
with your life. And we are the best. The
United States is, in my opinion, the
greatest nation in the history of the
earth for theoretical physics because we
are cowboys. We are irreverent.
We are the we are the people who
invented the atomic and hydrogen bombs.
the semiconductor.
Um,
this is what we do and we've lost the
ability to do it at an at a level that I
cannot believe happened during my watch,
my lifetime. So, from 1984 to the
present, those 42 years have been the
greatest intellectual
implosion I think that I know of, where
people just got dumber. And we're
already off to the races with Eric
jumping into his favorite simulation
where he pretends to be the wise old
grizzled veteran of the physics
community, looking down from his perch
of accomplishments and judging all the
clueless young upstarts, despite never
having been a physicist or ever having
done literally any physics literally
ever. It has the same energy as when old
drunks shout condescension at worldclass
athletes on the TV when they couldn't
jog half a mile even in their physical
prime. Eric, every single working
physicist in the world is smarter than
you and you're fooling nobody.
>> And what do you think is the cause? I'm
going to this uh humidif
>> quantum gravity.
>> Quantum gravity did.
>> Yep. Mhm. In 1984, there was a result
and it's called the Green Schwarz
anomaly cancellation.
>> There's something so amusing about Joe
queuing up Eric for his tired old
pageantry in the most half-assed manner
possible. Oh yeah, Eric, what's the
deal? Quantum gravity, huh? Crazy [\h__\h]
man. Anomaly, what? You can start with
your dumb stories. Don't mind me
rumaging around over here not giving a
[\h__\h] If you haven't heard this script
before, string theory, a sub field that
around 10% of theoretical physicists are
working on at best, has destroyed the
entire physics community because Eric,
the not a physicist, says so.
>> And the guy that I've talked to you
about before in UFO context, the guy who
is Lewis Whitten's son, Lewis Whitten,
happy happy birthday, turned 105,
um, was the anti-gravity guy from the
50s. His son Edward Whitten decided that
the 1984 Green Schwarz anomaly
cancellation meant that we should all
all the smartest people should pile into
one narrow subsp specialty and that that
was the future. And because he was so
much smarter than all of us, people
listened and I didn't.
>> Eric relies on the fact that absolutely
zero people listening know what he's
referring to. Nobody listening to Joe
Rogan knows what the Green Schwarz
anomaly cancellation is. I don't know
what it is. And I'm not even going to
look it up. Do you know why? Because it
doesn't matter. It could be a real thing
or not. It could be significant or not.
The only thing we need to pay attention
to is what he does with it. He is
claiming that one guy, Ed Witten,
personally decided that all of the
theoretical physicists in the world must
pile into one narrow subsp specialty.
and he physically forced them to do so.
This is not how the scientific community
has ever worked or will ever work. It
wasn't true in the 80s and it's not true
today. If one illustrious figure is
falling down an allegedly fruitless
rabbit hole, absolutely nobody will
follow them except perhaps a portion of
their own research group. Eric is first
fabricating a lack of success for string
theory and then pretending that nobody
in the world is doing anything else. You
don't have to understand a single thing
about theoretical physics to instantly
know that Eric is completely full of
[\h__\h] This is a total fabrication that
is being used to sell the desired
conclusion. All academic physicists are
dumb and wrong, and only the brave rebel
outsider cowboy physicist talking on the
super awesome free speech podcast is
right. It's a profoundly stupid story,
but Joe's viewers are pretty stupid, so
Eric lets it rip. In order for all
academic physicists to be dumb and wrong
together, they have to all be working on
the exact same thing. And that one thing
must be dumb and wrong. Eric can pretend
the one thing is dumb and wrong by
confidently saying physics words. And he
can pretend that all physicists are
working on that one thing by lying. One
huge lie plus some random jargon equals
all academic physicists are dumb and
wrong. So, universities are all dirty
woke commie hell holes by extension. And
Eric is the rogue trailblazer who sees
the future. And that future just happens
to be the one that lines the pockets of
Peter Teal and Elon Musk and all the
other oligarchs he glazes on a regular
basis. Pretty [\h__\h] convenient, huh?
>> Eroded yearbyear for 42 years.
>> And specifically, it was the pursuit of
string theory.
>> It's not string theory itself that's the
problem. String theory is harmless. It's
just a bunch of equations, a bunch of
ideas, and it's beautiful mathematics in
many places. So, um, that's not an
issue. The issue is the exclusion of
everything else, right? Which very
obviously is a lie since once again only
a tiny percentage of theoretical
physicists are working on string theory,
which means that all the rest are
working on other things. Even if you
consider only the portion working on
grand theory of everything type
research, it's a long list of
candidates. Plenty of people are working
on bold exotic ideas that most likely
will not bear any fruit and absolutely
nobody is stopping them because that's
how the [\h__\h] scientific community
works, which Eric has never been a part
of for a single day in his life.
>> So specifically like what is
what what's isolationist about string
theory? What is it about this one
particular theory that all this thought
has been pushed into that?
>> The claim is
that there's this thing called UV
complete physics and there's no way that
we can have a discussion about that
directly. If I could ask Jamie, could I
impose upon you to call up on YouTube
Wheel of Fortune and then use I've got a
good feeling about this. Uh, one L.
>> Did you really solve?
>> What's that?
>> Can I solve?
>> Okay.
>> It is a prize puzzle.
>> Yeah.
>> I've got a good feeling about this.
>> That's right.
>> That's insane.
>> That lady's a wizard.
>> That lady is what I want to do with my
life. That That is what great physics
looks like. It's totally irresponsible.
This is what great physics looks like,
you guys. Great physics is just like
winning a game show puzzle. How can
anyone take this ass clown seriously? He
simultaneously throws out technical
jargon to sound intelligent while
infantilizing the scientific process by
comparing it to Wheel of Fortune. It's
his fake April Fool's Day paper all over
again. What Eric wants to impart is that
physics should be guided by magic
intuition and not closedminded
empiricism. He neglects to acknowledge
that lots of physics has been achieved
by precisely this method. Brilliant
insight guiding inquiry. It then just
took a lot more followup than saying,
"I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat." But
don't worry, Eric prepared a monologue
to back up this analogy. Think about all
of those blank squares as orders of
magnitude that you are away from the
energies that would allow you to do
experiments that would explain physics.
and think about the apostrophe the L and
that pattern as well as the fact that
there's no R as the standard model of
physics.
So right now what you have is a debate
about whether or not we should buy more
and more letters with higher and higher
energy
or like should we build bigger
accelerators and spend more treasure
trying to collide particles or should we
just Caitlyn our way out of this? So
Caitlyn Burke is my model of what I
think we're supposed to be doing. First
of all, pretending that an apostrophe
and an L can represent the standard
model is [\h__\h] insane. This is
probably the single most successful
model in the history of science. I have
very recent particle physics tutorials
if you want to learn about this model in
depth. But the claim that it can be
represented by knowing two tiles out of
28, one of which was given, is not an
intellectually honest thing to say.
Having every single tile known except
for two would be a more honest
comparison. But second of all, who the
[\h__\h] is suggesting that it is frowned
upon to make some brilliant prediction
based on some nebulous intuition? Who is
stopping anyone from doing that? If
somebody could decipher what dark matter
is, whether it was a top physicist or
some random [\h__\h] eating chips on his
couch and the claim came with rigid
quantifiable predictions that were
validated empirically, then the physics
community would follow that thread and
expand on it and that person would get a
Nobel Prize. But physics is a lot more
complicated than guessing a common
English phrase. Eric wants the viewer to
think it's this easy because he's in the
business of convincing them that they're
smarter than physicists, but only
science illiterate narcissists will fall
for it.
>> Like the the the most marvelous thing
about that exchange is she says, "Can I
solve?" And there's like he's not even
sure he's hearing her properly. And then
finally he says, "Okay, that's that's
gatekeeping. Can I put this article on
the archive? Can I give a seminar in
your department? I want to solve the
puzzle. And a lot of what we're arguing
about is that the string theorists are
the only ones who have the right to try
to solve the puzzle. Yeah, Pat was
totally gatekeeping by immediately
letting her do the thing that is the
whole point of the game. [\h__\h] hell,
what a tool. Any legitimate researcher
can put any legitimate research on the
archive. And people give seminars on all
kinds of fringe topics all the time.
They're just at the edge of what is
empirically sound. That doesn't include
pretend scientists like Eric who are
perpetually butth hurt that real
scholars ignore his fake science. I
wasn't allowed to say that I gave a talk
in the physics department even though
any normal person would say that that
happened. And I wasn't allowed to do
that when I visited a uh physics
institution in Canada. I wasn't allowed
to say that I was visiting for a week.
Nor was I allowed to say that I gave a
seminar that lasted nine hours.
>> But you just did. Yeah. Are you a lawb
breaker?
>> I'm breaking the rules now because I've
now I've had it.
>> Ooh, Eric the rebel in a leather jacket
has had it up to here with your stinking
rules, you stupid nerds. I already did a
whole video on his Perimeter Institute
visit, so go check out that one if you
haven't seen it yet. It illustrates
magnificently how he coerces some kind
of soft visit to somewhere reputable
once in a blue moon exclusively to
launder their credibility and fuel this
narrative of being cancelled by the
ivory tower. It's all he's got.
>> I agreed I agreed to not do this and I'm
and with these missing scientists,
I've changed my mind.
I'm not going to deal with these people
anymore. And whatever is going on with
science and the suppression of different
ideas
um is terrifying.
Yes, Eric, cash in on a dumb conspiracy
theory. Missing UFO scientists. No, it
was always just a handful of unrelated
people who either died because sometimes
people die or they aren't even actually
dead, just retired. But whatever fuels
this delusional narrative about the
distributed idea suppression complex,
right?
>> Right now, we have a situation. I, you
know, I gave a talk at the University of
Chicago. There's no record of it.
>> No, we all know about your pathetic
economics tantrum at the University of
Chicago. I did a video on that, too. You
just wish there was no record of it
because you humiliated yourself and were
exposed by brilliant minds in the field
in real time who were live tweeting the
train wreck. Look, I've been lying my
whole life about my relationship with
the physics world because of this
pressure. They can't listen to me if I
say I'm a physicist. So, I say I'm an
entertainer.
Yeah. But that people say, "Well, why
would you do that? Why would you say
that you're an entertainer when you
obviously are conversant in all this
stuff?" And the answer is, I don't want
to die. I don't want to lose my ability
to enter a physics department. So, I I
take on this completely wrong persona.
You tell people you're not a physicist
because you aren't one. Eric, you've
never done any physics. And you
publicized that fact for years because
you wanted to discourage real physicists
from ever looking at your fake theory
since you knew that once that happened,
the facade would crumble and reality
would come crashing down. To academia,
you said this is a work of entertainment
released on April Fool's Day, so please
don't even look at it. And to the
podcast, Bro Masses, you said this is
the most revolutionary science of all
time and why is big bad ivory tower
academia ignoring me. It's so incredibly
transparent that you have to be an
intellectual toddler to not see the
tactic. But no, the evil lizard people
are coming to murder Eric because he's
too close to the truth. Lay the fantasy
on nice and thick, jackass.
>> I was told we're worried that you're
going to use it to legitimize yourself.
It's like I'm going to do that. Of
course I'm going. I have a PhD from
Harvard, you stupid I I mean like you
you guys imagine I'm I'm I'm a podcast
guest.
>> Yes. That is literally all that you are.
You are a fraud who tells lies on
podcasts. That is your precise job. That
is what you get paid by Peter Teal to
do. You have never done any science
whatsoever. Even during the time you
fumbled your way through a doctorate and
had your Israel connections pull strings
at Harvard to get someone to help you
finish it. As I elucidated in another
video, you have never published a single
thing, not even your shitty
dissertation. You have zero
publications. You are irrelevant. It's
your moneyed connections that earn you
sporadic facetime at these institutions
which bring shame to those institutions.
So they tell you to keep your mouth shut
because they know you're going to use
them to pretend that you're a real
scientist. You can't publish anything
since you don't do anything. So, I gave
a talk at place is the best you can hope
for.
>> I am the greatest danger to the
narrative.
I'm I'm the most followed mathematician
in the United States. Maybe the world.
Hana fry may be above it. That danger to
the narrative is the problem.
>> Having lots of gullible followers on
Twitter doesn't make you a mathematician
and it doesn't make you a threat to any
narrative. You're a threat to democracy,
but science doesn't give a [\h__\h] about
you any more than science can be
accurately characterized as a narrative.
Could you briefly just describe like
what what is the pro so there's not a
problem with string string theory or is
string theory not complete or is string
theory readed uh has it reaped actual
results
>> mathematically it's reaped results and
string theorists have occasionally
um done really great work in in a
subject called quantum field theory but
quantum field theory isn't about the
quantum field theory of the world
quantum field theory is like calculus
it's some thing that's very useful and
it it grew up in physics. But we've now
found out that quantum field theory has
to do with pure problems in mathematics
that have nothing to do with physics.
>> That's right. Quantum field theories
have nothing to do with physics, you
guys. They definitely don't describe the
fundamental forces that physics studies.
QED isn't about electromagnetism at all.
And QCD isn't about the strong nuclear
force at all. It's just a bunch of
stupid math that has zero correlation
with reality. Anybody who knows
literally the first thing about quantum
field theories can immediately identify
this as total horseshit. It's just a
baseless claim that is used to sell the
narrative that physicists are off doing
silly math that is nothing to do with
reality. It couldn't possibly be further
from the truth. QED predicts the
anomalous magnetic dipole moment of the
electron to 12 decimal places. It is the
single most precise agreement between
theoretical calculation and experimental
measurement in the history of science.
When somebody says something as insanely
stupid as what Eric just said, something
so instantly and demonstrably and
profoundly false, they should be totally
discounted for the rest of their lives.
Nobody should ever give a [\h__\h] about
anything Eric says ever again. And
fortunately, we're getting close.
>> And well, what was the purpose of it?
But by saying that you became that
physicists became too dangerous, the
ideas became too dangerous is the idea
that the weapons would become so immense
and powerful that they had to do
something to stop and curb that.
>> Well, we didn't know how to control it,
right? So, in other words, for example,
in the in 1940,
we set up something called the reference
committee, which I'm sure your listeners
have never heard of. And the reference
committee lived inside of the National
Resource Council. Now, why was it
important? because chain reaction
physics was so hot once the neutron was
found. Right? So, think about neutrons
as bullets. Um, they can go right into
the middle of an atom because they're
they're not positively charged. So,
they're not going to be repelled by the
nucleus and they can bust apart atoms
that are b barely being held together.
And that's why you you get bullets
beginning bullets be getting bullets and
that's what a chain reaction is. The
people who were doing that in the 40 in
the 30s suddenly found that when they
mailed off a paper to a journal if they
weren't part of the secret group in Los
Alamos
their paper got held up and sent back
for revisions.
>> What a perfect demonstration of the Eric
Weinstein formula. Here's this thing
you've never heard of that probably
doesn't even exist which reflexively
makes you believe I know more than you.
extend that to present an objective
falsehood which conjures up
conspiratorial thought and the end point
blanket anti-establishment sentiment. In
this case, the thing is the mysterious
reference committee. I find no evidence
of such a vaguely named entity having
anything to do with nuclear fishision.
The falsehood is that nobody could
publish research on nuclear fishision.
Total [\h__\h] In 1939, work was
published on controlled chain reactions
all over the world, especially in
Europe, not Los Alamos. The internal
logic doesn't even work. He's pretending
that the only research being published
was from the super secret group that
didn't want anyone knowing what they
were doing. He's constantly spewing
trivially debunkable [\h__\h] He's just
good at sounding like he's saying
something important.
>> And and and I believe a lot of the junk
is a fixed to the narrative so that
those who want to follow the
institutional instruction to ignore the
fact that this is happening can point to
the crappiness.
Right? And so that's the out. And the
really difficult thing that you do and
you do really well is you try to piece
together, okay, what's [\h__\h] what's
real. There's a lot of real in the UFO
story and there's a lot of nonsense.
>> There's a lot of real in the COVID story
and a lot of nonsense. The same thing is
true for physics, but physics is more
dangerous.
>> Joe is specifically terrible at
separating what's [\h__\h] from what's
real. That's why he's had you on his
show eight [\h__\h] times and your
[\h__\h] little brother and dozens of
other frauds just as worthless as you.
Often spreading medical misinformation
that kills people. Joe being so bad at
precisely the thing you're glazing him
for is kind of destroying human
civilization. Actually, everything about
the UFO stories is nonsense. Everything
you regurgitate about CO is nonsense.
Almost everything that happens in this
podcast, Broace is nonsense. Physics is
not at all like that. And legitimate
physics is nowhere near as dangerous as
all the facious narratives that [\h__\h]
like you pedal.
>> So these specific scientists that are
missing,
whatever the number is, five, six, that
you think are legitimate, what what
specifically are they working on that's
so dangerous?
>> Well, the fusion guy obviously is uh at
MIT is anybody who might I I don't know.
Fusion isn't my thing. Plasma isn't my
thing. Um, but that is unquestionably uh
dangerous if you imagine how much
depends on oil. And is there is it a
good assumption that if you have one
incredibly brilliant person that's at
the head of this thing and they make a
breakthrough, if you kill that guy, the
whole thing is in disarray because the
people that are under him, whatever
people he has working with him aren't as
fully immersed in it as he is that you
can kind of like handicap a problem.
It's like let's say if there's
>> top five people,
>> it's an energy thing. Let's say if it's
an energy thing. No, that's a terrible
assumption that reflects a profound
cluelessness about the scientific
community. It is almost never the case
that one singular researcher has
exclusive domain over a particular
breakthrough. There are so many groups
working on fusion. There are over 150
research organizations, 50 private
companies, tons of university physics
groups worldwide, all working on fusion.
There are a plethora of operational
fusion facilities with reactors such as
Tokamax that effectively perform fusion.
Multiple groups have achieved net
positive fusion at the reaction level
and they're working on scaling up to a
functional plant. There are thousands of
people who collectively share this
knowledge about fusion. The idea that
murdering a single person could somehow
[\h__\h] progress in this area is [\h__\h]
idiotic. And the only people who could
fall for such a narrative are science
illiterate toddlers whose entire
conception of science is based on sci-fi
movies where the one crazy dude with the
crazy hair makes the crazy thing. End of
story. Okay, let's skip a super long
section where Eric tries to be relatable
by talking about blues rock and get
straight to the Epstein stuff.
>> No, you're one of one of the people that
uh saw through him right away. No, but
he offered me partnership and I didn't
take it and I regretted that for a while
>> because you would have been chuch-ching.
>> I would have been made rich or deceased.
>> Probably both.
>> Probably both. Yeah. A couple times I've
been offered real wealth and with crazy
stuff, but the Epstein thing, I don't
know that I've actually said that on a
podcast. Um, yeah. He offered me
partnership and the only condition was
that I had to get rid of my existing
partners.
Like I had to stab my partners in the
back in order to become his partner.
>> Oh yeah. So he'd own you.
>> Yeah. In case you didn't know, Eric
talks about Epstein all the [\h__\h]
time. He's claimed on numerous podcasts
that Epstein was closely following his
development of geometric unity, which of
course is a lie to inflate the
legitimacy of his fake theory that
absolutely nobody reputable would ever
care about, while also making himself
seem supremely adjacent to the cultural
zeitgeist. Forest Gump, remember?
>> I can't come up with a single
explanation that makes sense of what I
now know. And also the fact that the
government outreached to me and to Sam
Harris and to Lex Friedman. And you
know, there was this thing where these
guys who checked out um said there's
going to be a massive disclosure and we
need people to disseminate these things
to the public and you have a share of
the of the public who listens to you and
we need to get you informed so that you
can help mediate the disclosure. That's
right. The US government selected Eric
and Sam and Lex as the official
ambassadors that would disseminate the
super secret UFO truth. You guys, what
an honor. I don't know what's funniest,
a podcaster pretending to be important
because they regurgitate these
narratives, Eric pretending that the
government would ever select him for
literally anything, or that such blatant
political distractions are being
uncritically swallowed by the delusional
masses who historically have always
reflexively distrusted anything the
government has ever said. Way to make an
exception, guys. on Pierce Morgan, I
said this thing um which is that New
Mexico is the connector of the nuclear
story, the Epstein story, and the UFO
story. They're all going to come
together.
Remember when we're only talking about
the island?
>> Mhm. My favorite moments are when Eric
spews some conspiratorial crap that not
even Joe will jump at and he just sits
and waits hoping to get some traction
and when it doesn't happen he just bails
and pivots. It's so adorable.
>> But this is the story that like somehow
we we're so hung up about sex. We're
either angry about trafficking or we're
getting off on the idea that all these
rich people um are going to get their
comeuppants or you know we keep turning
the Epstein story into something other
than a scientific espionage story which
is one of its one of its facets. Eric is
perplexed as to why everyone is so
fixated on the global billionaire
pedophile ring. Why is everyone freaking
out about the decades of child rape that
nobody is being held accountable for?
You guys, I want to talk about
scientific espionage. Holy [\h__\h] what a
douchebag.
>> Control of science, Joe,
is not something that is officially a
big issue and it is a massive issue.
It's not publicly a big issue.
>> That's correct.
>> No, the idea that one person could
control all of science is not an issue
because that's objectively not a thing.
>> There's nothing more important than
theoretical physicists, you idiots.
And and you don't fund these people and
you don't watch them. Like the
Department of Energy is supposed to have
counter intelligence
to stop creeps from hanging around the
national labs, which is America's secret
university system. Hello, Eric is too
dumb to avoid constantly contradicting
himself. Hey, Eric. Are theoretical
physicists the most brilliant paradigm
shifting geniuses in the world who wield
such immense power with their big brains
because they can create all kinds of
crazy technologies that can be used to
enslave the world? Or are they a bunch
of clueless morons that haven't
accomplished anything for the past 50
years because they all have their heads
up a goose's ass chasing strings? Make
up your [\h__\h] mind.
>> Epstein set up a listening post.
Now, what are what's the UFO story? The
UFO story is all about nukes.
And what was Epstein doing in Cambridge,
Massachusetts? The analog of Zoro Ranch
is named One Brattle Square. It's right
in the heart of Harvard Square. You
know, I know it like the back of my
hand. It's a seven minute walk to the
science center. The Harvard Science
Center on floors 3, four, and five is
where the math department is. And who
was Epstein's initial contact in the
math department?
It wasn't Martin Noak who he funded.
There's a different guy named Benedict
Gross. Dick Gross was an expert in
number theory and an elliptic curves.
An elliptic curves are what power the
cryptography behind Bitcoin, behind
public keys.
>> Random name, random concept, meaningless
connections. Listen to my annoyed tone
at having to explain all of this to you
guys. This is Eric fabricating the
illusion that he's the hot shot
detective at the corkboard solving the
case when he's really just an irrelevant
jackass with zero purpose outside of
podcasts.
>> Jeffrey Epstein is a construct. Uh-huh.
>> You know, there's this whole question
about like, why won't Jews talk about
Jeffrey Epstein and the sex [\h__\h] It's
like, as if I haven't been on this since
2004. Well, who's the only person who
has a who has the ability to build
something?
The CIA has its own for has its own
construction company.
>> Oh, look. Eric the Zionist [\h__\h] is
trying to convince the viewers that
Epstein was CIA, not MSAD. Isn't that
shocking? You know, Elon
is constantly tripping over the fact
that
I think he's a wild guy. I'm up for wild
guys. I want cowboy billionaires, cowboy
physicists, cowboy everything.
>> But in general, we don't want cowboys.
>> No, it's quite the opposite. In fact,
there's nothing generally wrong with
cowboys, but cowboy billionaires, not so
much. Riding and roping up politicians
to serve the whim of the oligarchy at
the severe peril of the public is not
really a good thing, guys. Elon's a
piece of [\h__\h] And so is your pay
master, Peter Teal.
>> He knows about the history of my stuff
and something called cyber witten
theory. He doesn't know anything
concrete. How does he know all this
stuff? He was in my world.
>> I'm important, you guys. Epstein thought
I was smart and he wanted to understand
my super awesome work. Trust me, bro. At
every turn in my life since I was a
young man, Jeffrey Epstein was there in
the background, even though I only meet
him once.
>> Why do you think that is?
>> Because we're interested in the exact
same thing. I'm interested in the same
thing as Jeffrey Epstein is a [\h__\h]
wild thing to say out loud. Eric, I know
you've been the biggest laughingtock of
the entire internet for several years
now, but you sure seem eager to keep the
title.
>> I care about finance and financial
markets. I care about the CPI. I care
about the fate of Israel. I care about
uh evolutionary theory. I care about
mathematics that goes like geometry like
the geometry of elliptic curves, but
really more in differential geometry.
You care about physics,
>> right? You care about pretending to know
about money since that's your fake title
for Peter Teal to cover for your podcast
grifting. You care about Israel because
you're a worthless genocideup supporting
sack of Zionist excrement. You care
about evolutionary theory because you're
gearing up to support the oligarchy you
represent as they merge with Christian
nationalism and try to get religion
taught in public school science classes.
And you care about math and physics
because that's the language you use to
pretend to be a genius. What else is
new?
>> He was meeting in my offices in San
Francisco while I wasn't aware of it in
2017.
>> I didn't know that.
>> Meeting in your offices. Meaning he went
to your office and met with who?
>> Well, with with Peter. That's in the
records
>> about you.
>> No, I don't know. He He He hopefully
not. I know that I'm in an email that he
sends Peter late in the story, but I'm
I'm not going to discuss specifics, but
No, I was telling Peter not to deal with
him, and Peter thought I was overblowing
the the danger.
>> Well, it's a little too late for that,
Eric. Teal is all over the Epstein
files, like thousands of direct
correspondences, millions of dollars in
investments. He denies having visited
the island, but you go ahead and decide
whether you buy that or not. I don't,
especially given certain emails where he
expresses specific interest in going.
Teal's palunteer is responsible for
Israel being the high-tech terrorist
state that it is, as well as ICE. And
ultimately, that's the thread that
always unites all of these [\h__\h]
Support for dystopian surveillance,
domestic terrorism, imperialism, and
genocide.
>> But what do you think his purpose was?
Like so getting connected to all these
scientists being around all this
knowledge the New Mexico I still don't
understand like what was the endgame?
>> Can I get another drink?
>> Absolutely.
>> Thank you sir.
>> Interesting moment to deflect Eric. What
was Epstein's ultimate purpose indeed?
Many say it was to gain leverage over
world leaders and other global elites to
blackmail them into supporting Israel.
But that would make Israel evil and Eric
loves Israel.
>> Standard framing of Jeffrey Epstein as a
MSAD asset is well supported. Robert
Maxwell, Glain's father, sold Israel
backdoor promise software to Sandia
National Laboratories in 1985. His
eldest daughter, Christine Maxwell,
built the FBI's post 911
counterterrorism data warehouse through
her company Chiliad. Uh Isabelle
Maxwell, Christine's twin sister,
co-founded
Commouch with Israel unit 8 8,200
alumni. Galain ran the human
intelligence operation, the Israel
intelligence network around both Maxwell
and Epstein is documented and
substantial. But the intelligence
infrastructure supporting Ebstein and
Maxwell at Zoro Ranch points somewhere
else or to somewhere additional. It
points the United States military
intelligence, plain and simple, right?
List off a bunch of connections that
firmly link Epstein and Maxwell to
Israel and then say, "But look, also
America." While the American Israel
military machine offers little
distinction between the two regions,
it's just a constant supply of weapons
and money from one place to another. So,
there's not much to talk about here.
Thoughts, Eric?
>> So, this is what I've been trying to say
all along. The only country that I'm
absolutely positive was behind Jeffrey
Epstein is is us.
You can't operate here.
Look, right now we are in the middle of
endless anti-semitic Christmas.
just goes on forever.
>> That's right. Epstein has nothing to do
with Israel. Everyone is just a bunch of
dirty anti-semmites who don't like
belligerent genocidal ethnostates that
are currently bombing and annexing the
entire Middle East because Yahweh said
it was cool.
>> So you think Epstein is essentially just
a construct figurehead of an
intelligence gathering organization?
>> No.
>> Epstein is a construct. First, first of
all, second of all,
>> I love Joe earnestly trying to follow
this trail of grease only for Eric to
shut him down and immediately pivot.
Nobody can be on his level, so stop
trying.
>> What does this have to do with the
science community?
One,
we have huge amounts of power.
The United States is terribly configured
because we pretend that we're okay doing
everything through our university
system, which shouldn't be done. All of
science is done in the university system
and that's bad. But also, universities
are pointless [\h__\h] holes for woke losers
where nothing gets done since all the
real science happens in secret
government programs. And by the way,
physicists are so otherworldly powerful.
But also, physicists are idiots who
haven't done anything but play with
their dicks for the past 50 years
because string theory is stupid. Even
Joe isn't dumb enough to put up with
this crap indefinitely. Like,
>> you have to be honest about the fact
that we're badly configured.
>> What do you mean by that?
>> We didn't know how deadly physics was.
When Rutherford in 1911 said that
there's a neutron,
nobody I'm I'm sure nobody said to him,
"Oh my god, you've ended the planet. Now
new humanity is doomed." So it used to
be the case that physics was something
that was like interesting and fun.
>> But now it's like the most deadly thing
you can imagine as well as being
interesting. Rutherford said there are
neutrons in 1911. What? He discovered
the atomic nucleus in 1917 and Chadwick
discovered the neutron in 1932. This
[\h__\h] is all over the place. Yes,
physics produced apocalyptic weapons and
in possibly the most profound display of
maturity nobody thought the human
species was capable of. We didn't
destroy ourselves with them. At least
not yet. This news is older than Eric.
So, I'm waiting for the punchline. So
they let the physics people work out all
these problems and then they take
whatever their findings are and apply
them to weapons.
>> Boom. Vroom and zoom.
>> Right?
>> And that changed the economy. It changes
the ability to compute.
This is what this is who I really am.
This is what I really do. And I will not
mouth this narrative that all of my
colleagues will mouth.
Physics is interesting. Yeah. A lot of
the time it's dull.
>> This is who I am, Joe. I'm Boom, Vroom,
and Zoom. Just look at all of my
incredible contributions to weapons and
energy production and material science
and propulsion and communications and so
much other stuff because I'm a wounded
polymath Einstein guy. Just look at all
of my precisely zero contributions to
any area of science since I'm not a
scientist and never have been. Can you
believe this jerk? Your colleagues are
Joe Rogan and Theo Vaughn [\h__\h] not
scientists.
>> That's a real possibility.
>> Yeah.
>> That string theory exists as a
distraction.
>> Joe, what do you think the odds are that
a scientist can say, "My failed theory
is the only game in town," and not get
laughed out of town?
>> Zero. Which is why absolutely nobody
does that since string theory isn't
failed at all. You just refuse to talk
about its empirical successes regarding
things like predicting the viscosity of
the quark gluon plasma. And absolutely
zero people say it's the only game in
town because it isn't since most
theoretical physicists are working on
other things. You're just quote mining
Ed Whitten because he referred to the
fact that string theory is the only
theory of everything that has a tiny
shred of empirical grounding. And he's
right. Get a new script, [\h__\h]
>> So what do you think they're working on?
these people at this upstate New York
University.
>> Well, what are we not working on? In
other words, how do you discover what
we're actually up to? Is in part you
listen for the holes?
What do I work on?
I work on the ability to get out of the
solar system. That is my life's mission.
>> It's your life's mission to get out of
the solar system. Yet, you're 60 years
old and you've done literally nothing
whatsoever towards that mission. Your
ego is over in the [\h__\h] Andromeda
galaxy, but down here on Earth, you're
just some douchebag who pretends to be
smart on podcasts. It's absolutely
insane that Eric would say something
like this. He's not just glazing Elon
Musk like he usually does, saying, "I'm
such a smart guy and I'm telling you
that we should give money to the genius
rocket man who will get us off world."
He is pretending that he himself is
working on interstellar travel despite
never having published a single scrap of
anything whatsoever in any area of human
inquiry. This isn't 2017, Eric.
Everybody knows what a loser you are.
Just stop.
>> I think Elon is a bit of a [\h__\h]
>> Okay. How so?
>> I don't know. He won't meet with me.
>> Well,
>> it's okay.
>> Maybe because you call him a [\h__\h]
>> Yeah. No, but
>> maybe he's busy. Maybe he's trying to
make chicks pregnant.
>> No,
>> nothing like a little casual misogyny to
endear yourself to the insults you're
trying to win back. E, Eric, Elon is a
lot of things, most of them bad. But one
feather in his cap is that he's too
smart to give a [\h__\h] about you. It's fun
to watch you cry about it, though.
>> Elon doesn't trust scientists for good
reason, cuz they're weak. You just got
done with a huge rant about how
physicists are the most powerful super
awesome mind ninjas in the world making
paradigm shifting technology on the
regular. The whiplash is exhausting. The
goal is to get out of the solar system
and we're so far away from everything
good that there's no way of doing it
under relativity.
So why are we not researching the only
thing that can save us which is
diversification? We need to spread out
to the largest number of habitable
worlds possible.
>> So this implies some sort of a new
propulsion system.
>> This implies new science. Stop thinking
technology. There's no way to you can't
engineer your way out of a science
problem. You have to science your way
out of it.
>> And what would be that science?
>> Post Einstein, post relativity. That's
what I do.
>> You don't do any science at all, Eric.
And no, the fastest way around the
universe would be wormholes, which are
firmly grounded specifically in general
relativity. They just require an amount
of energy that is absolutely
unthinkable, making it an engineering
and money problem, not a science
problem. You are trivially wrong. As
always,
>> if you can only go the speed of light at
your best, and you can't even get
anywhere close to that, how are you
going to get to something four years o
light years away?
>> Okay. Um
in a fantasy world by the time you go
and come back even assuming all nobody
no
>> assume you can go under the speed of
light just under you can use time
dilation
>> and relativistic effects to your benefit
but it's going to cost you eight years
to go and come back
>> right
>> nobody would be coming back jackass in
every movie about this concept you have
a huge ship transporting thousands of
people to establish a new colony on
another world nobody is coming back. You
say you want people living on other
worlds because everything is going to go
to [\h__\h] here. So why are you pretending
they should be coming back? The science
behind new forms of propulsion are
wellestablished. Fusion, solar sales,
matter antimatter annihilation. We know
about this [\h__\h] It's just a nearly
insurmountable technical challenge. The
physics itself is well understood.
Making an engine that exploits that
physics is crazy hard. If we could build
an engine that operates on antimatter,
we could get up to a quarter of the
speed of light and send a few thousand
people to another system within a
generation. None of this is mysterious.
It's just hard.
>> Okay, I don't want to do that. If I'm
going to explore the cosmos, I don't
want to use I don't want to live in
space.
>> So, what are the alternatives?
The observerse,
the successor to spacetime, I'm happy to
predict this on your show, will be named
the observerse, which is a combination
of not just using a four-dimensional
space-time manifold, but a 14 and a
four-dimensional space simultaneously.
This was what I was talking about at the
university yesterday.
>> And how would that like when you say the
difference between science and
technology?
>> So, how would that science be applied?
If we look at the surface of this table,
I can't do this to it.
>> Can't spread it apart, move it. Right?
>> It's called pinch to zoom, right?
>> It's a multi-touch gesture invented
around 2003 or something. Debuted at
TED.
>> But if I come to this device, I can do
that
>> your phone,
>> right? So imagine that this is spaceime,
>> okay?
>> And this is the observers.
So, if I want to go to a distant star,
there's no way I'm going to just go
really fast, right?
>> That's dumb. Um, and I need an energy
source and I need to do things that we
can't normally do. You have to jailbreak
spacetime. If Einstein is in force, we
all die. If we go beyond Einstein, some
of us will live and some of us will die.
It's so simple. The observers, you guys,
just pinch to zoom and make everything
in the universe closer. Jailbreak
spacetime like the iPhone you bought on
eBay. Einstein was too dumb to figure
this out. He needed a W before his name
to be smart enough to figure out the
observers. This is how you know Eric is
absolutely done pretending geometric
unity is a thing. He has thrown in the
towel. This is his new shiny toy.
>> In part, what I'm trying to do is to
jailbreak spacetime. That's what I'm
actually doing.
And I'm doing it with zero support, with
no confirmation that this is real
because something is controlling my
entire community to make this funny haha
just like Forbidden City was Jack Crap.
Jack Raper has gone mad. He thinks that
there's a city in New Mexico where
there's a mayor who's a second Einstein
developing a doomsday weapon. Is that
funny? What a loon that guy. What an
idiot. Haha.
That's what's going on, Joe.
>> Yep. Lone rogue cowboy trailblazer
fighting against the evil corrupt system
to bring everybody to outer space and
save humanity. The physics community is
all about boom vroom zoom changing the
world. But nobody will listen to Eric's
better than Einstein ideas because
reasons. Same old script.
>> We live in flat land. We don't know we
live in flat land. And I know what that
technically the name is fiber dimension.
what it is. We have to gain access to
it, which is discovering that somebody
gives you a an obsidian rock that has a
property that you've never seen before
called pinch to zoom. So, I need to make
the distance to the nearest star small
so I can go with reasonable speed
>> or instantaneously.
>> I don't need instantaneously.
If if I have something four lightyears
away and I can make it 100 ft away, I
can walk 100 ft easily enough.
>> Eric wants to drag Proxima Centauri over
to just 100 ft away so we can walk
there. There is absolutely zero downside
to being 100 ft away from a star. It
wouldn't instantly vaporize the whole
planet or anything. In general, nothing
bad could happen by rearranging the
entire galaxy like a [\h__\h] sandbox
video game. A thing that is precisely as
undesirable as it is physically
impossible. Astounding. And you feel
like it's possible to hide all this from
the general public?
>> Well, my point is you're not gonna hide
it. They No, no, no. The same way they
did it before would be spoiled by
satellites
right now. If you tried to do Los
Alamos, you couldn't do it because of
the satellites,
>> right?
>> So, it has to be hidden in plain sight.
It has to look like something that it
isn't.
>> So, if you asked me, let's imagine you
asked me a different question. Let's
imagine you asked me, Eric, nobody's
willing to give you money. Nobody's
willing to employ you. Nobody's willing
to have you speak at their seminar,
despite the fact you have complete blue
chip credibility.
How would you how would you organize a
secret team to get control of our
adversaries, the world, and the ability
to traverse the cosmos? I sure sure as
[\h__\h] wouldn't build a chemical rocket
company. It's dumb. But I do it as
cover.
>> Eric so transparently wants to have a
conversation with himself that he's just
putting flattering questions in Joe's
mouth and answering them. You have zero
credibility, Eric. And it's specifically
because you say moronic [\h__\h] like this.
It's so dumb to build rockets if you
want to go to space. Of course, he has
to throw in the word chemical because
it's true that combustion isn't going to
get us very far. But once again, plenty
of other paradigms in propulsion have
been firmly validated on the theoretical
level. Somebody just has to build the
[\h__\h] And Eric has a better chance of
fronting the next hit boy band than a
crack squad of researchers that will fly
us to the stars.
>> I'm using Soviets, Joe. Ex-s Soviets,
>> okay?
>> Cuz those guys haven't haven't lost the
magic.
And uh you know, I had Frankle and a guy
named Misha Capranov come down
for 5 days to kick the [\h__\h] out of my
theory.
It was crazy. Absolutely crazy. We're
drinking vodka at like 10:00 a.m. having
insane meals
and just working our asses off the way
we're supposed to.
How'd it go?
>> Amazing.
What do they think about your theory?
>> So far, all systems go, Joe. So
basically, Eric sits alone in his
kitchen stuffing his face and getting
hammered all day while shouting all
systems go at blowup dolls in the other
chairs, which he pretends are
physicists. At least that's my bet
because he sure as [\h__\h] isn't discussing
any theories of his own with any
physicists since he doesn't have any.
Guy's new [\h__\h] isn't one either. C
>> can we just pull up
I I just want to do this for my own
reasons. Can we pull up the lead the
pinned tweet on my Twitter profile,
which by the way, thank you for
retweeting.
>> No problem.
>> Yeah, love you.
>> Love you too. What is it? Go to it real
quick.
>> Those two formulas,
the bottom one says CFJ.
C is Sean Carol,
the middle F is uh Fields and J is Roman
JKE, a professor at MIT.
Sean Carol's second most um cited paper
is has this as its action or lrangeian.
Right above that is my action or
lrangeian.
And what you see all those zeros is
things that Sean Carroll doesn't know
how to handle. And that thing where you
see a P, you see star parentheses P on
the bottom line, not the B second from
the bottom is Shaun's relativity
violating uh hack. Sean Carroll did not
disclose
that geometric unity is a direct
competitor to his most cited work. Sean
Carroll is a stupid butthole who doesn't
even know how to do math. And he never
even talks about how Gu is a competitor
with his dumb theory. Even though, no,
it [\h__\h] isn't since GU isn't a
theory. But I just said a bunch of math
stuff. So Shawn is dumb. And he
definitely didn't publicly humiliate me
on Piers Morgan so brutally that I will
never fully recover. Take that, Sean.
The good news is I have read Eric's
paper. Here it is. I actually have it
here. Right here. First thing you got to
do is make sure that your theory makes
contact with modern physics as it is
understood. If you have a new paper out,
business are going to look at it.
They're going to look for, you know,
where's Lrangeian?
So, this is for people that are just
listening. This is showing that you have
Lrangeians in your these
>> showing Sean Carol lying,
>> right?
>> Interactions.
>> Did you The interactions are in there as
well, but you call Did you call him out
on this on the show? I couldn't believe
that he'd do this.
>> So, you didn't say anything?
>> Stunned.
>> Oh, snap. Shawn lied and Eric brought
receipts. Look at his fake paper. It has
the word Lrangeians as the header for a
whole section. So, Shawn is a buttface
liar and Eric is super awesome. In
reality, there are no legitimate
lrangeians in this section. This was
debunked in extreme detail with the help
of Christian FCKO in the video about his
interaction with Eric at the Perimeter
Institute debacle. I'll play a short
clip now. Is there actually any lrgonian
in this paper? Now, technically, if
we're being extremely generous, there is
a section, section 9 of the paper, and
below equation 9.4, he writes in very
obtuse notation what he claims to be the
lrangeian for geometric unity. So, there
is a formula there that you can point
to, but this is kind of fake. So, I
think merely mentioning, oh, here is a
lrangeian in the paper, but not actually
defining all of the ingredients.
Crucially, this lrgonian involves the
Shiab operator which we've mentioned
which has not been defined. So you can
write this formula but if pieces are not
defined I don't think this qualifies as
a lrronian because no physicist can use
this can do calculations can make
predictions because the pieces are just
not there. So even though you can maybe
point to this and say okay well Sean
says there's no lrangeian I think more
precisely what Sean probably meant is
there is no usable well-defined
lrangeian in the paper which is
absolutely true.
>> That's right. Several qualified experts
including Tim Wyn and Christian FKO have
debunked the [\h__\h] out of geometric unity
on my channel. Eric has never responded
to any of their points or even
acknowledged their existence in any way
whatsoever. Sorry, Eric. Everyone can
smell the damage control a mile away,
which is extra pathetic considering the
Shawn Carroll thing was a [\h__\h] year
ago. So, take your Shiaob operator and
go [\h__\h] yourself.
>> So, my claim is
>> How can you respond like right there,
>> Joe? What am I just Let's just one
second.
>> I'm in a world that makes absolutely no
sense and I don't want to disappear. I'm
not suicidal.
I have been the major competitor of
string theory for 42 years. I'm not a
podcaster. I'm not a guest. I'm not an
entertainer. You are specifically a
podcast guest and entertainer. That is
literally all you are. That's even how
you identify yourself in your fake GU
paper. You are not a competitor of
string theory. You don't even understand
string theory. You're a [\h__\h] poser.
And your response to Joe asking why you
didn't press Shawn about this alleged
lie regarding Lrangeians shouldn't be,
"I didn't push back because somebody's
going to kill me." It should be, "I
can't push back because if I initiated
an actual discussion about Lrangeians,
he would have explained how this does
not qualify. So, I chose to stay silent
and [\h__\h] about it later by pointing to
the vague [\h__\h] I call a lrangeian,
even though it isn't." All set. For some
reason, the things that we're talking
about on this show are dangerous.
We're having dangerous conversations,
Joe. That's what JRE does. JRE has
dangerous conversations. Whining like a
little [\h__\h] about how much string
theory sucks is dangerous, Joe. spewing
endless horseshit about advanced ancient
civilizations that definitely didn't
exist is super dangerous because big
archaeology is going to roll a boulder
on you like an Indiana Jones. Telling
millions of people that Ivormectin cures
literally everything is dangerous
because the big pharma mafia is going to
whack you even though nobody has ever
done that because there is no danger
apart from the extreme danger of the
medical misinformation Joe spreads that
kills people. Jesus [\h__\h] Christ, what
a melodramatic [\h__\h] And sometimes you
you go all the way and sometimes you
puss out. But like this is a dangerous
place because they can't tell you what
to do. And that's why they put you in
like a different color on the screen
during CO because you went against the
narrative.
The narrative was go get vaccinated.
The narrative was if you think that CO
came from anything other than a wet
market, you're a racist. Every time
you've gone up against the narrative,
they try to destroy you. The infamous
they is trying to destroy you for going
against the narrative, Joe. Vaccinating
during a global pandemic with vaccines
whose safety and efficacy had been
clinically demonstrated is just a stupid
narrative. Not like the [\h__\h]
narratives that they're gene therapy or
that they make people's hearts explode
or that they cause cancer or that they
killed millions of people. Those are
straight facts. SARS Corona virus 2
originating from the Huan food market
like literally all of the
epidemiological data confirms is just a
stupid narrative. Not like the [\h__\h]
narrative that is the multiaceted lab
leak propaganda campaign. That's the
super hot truth. Eric is just gargling
Joe's balls and reinforcing the facade
of what Joe wants to believe he is so
that he will continue to greenlight
Eric's dog [\h__\h] stories. Nothing more.
>> So then we leaprog dust in some
propulsion technology. I believe that
there is a nation
in Asia,
>> China, which puts on amazing drone shows
and buys up our academics who aren't
being paid because we're sitting around
bitching. What have you what have you
technical people done for us? Why do you
deserve to be paid from taxpayer
dollars? And the answer is, oh, shut the
[\h__\h] up.
We created your economy, you stupid
[\h__\h]
We're the baddest of the bad. We We are
the source of your wealth and your
strength. And you come to us bitching
about your taxpayer dollars. You deserve
to lose to China, you little
I love how Eric says we like he's part
of the community that innovated all the
technology he's referencing when he
probably can't even build IKEA furniture
without hiring a task rabbit. And again,
are physicists superheroes or
incompetent losers? Make up your [\h__\h]
mind. I I have no words for the also the
new crop of tech billionaires who were
bitten by co
>> who think that
>> what do you mean by that?
>> Well, they think that Anthony Fouchy was
a scientist and so they they believed in
science before Fouchy and now they don't
believe in science.
>> I don't understand what you're saying.
>> Oh my god.
>> I don't I literally don't understand
what you're saying.
>> All right. I will give Joe an ounce of
credit for not always blindly nodding
his head when Eric is making zero sense,
but sometimes telling him he's not
making a [\h__\h] ounce of sense. Fouchy
is objectively a scientist, a highly
distinguished one. Eric's just named
dropping him because the brain deadad
podcast bro masses have been trained to
recoil at any mention of him. The next
part also makes no sense. Who are the
new crop of tech billionaires? Does that
include your pay master Peter? You're
saying they were all pro-s science
before the pandemic and anti-science
after? Or are you saying the opposite of
that? Never mind. You're saying
literally nothing as usual.
>> Silicon Valley had a huge about face
when they figured out that Fouchy was
full of [\h__\h]
A lot of them bankrolled our
universities. They supported science.
They were Democrats. And then somehow
COVID happened. And because they had
this childlike belief in universities,
science, and the Democratic Party, they
ran to the Republican party like
children,
not understanding
that
Anthony Fouchy was not a scientist. CO
is a giant lie.
Collins and Fouchy and Ralph Bareric and
Peter Dac are menaces to the credit of
scient of science.
>> Okay, let's unpack that mountain of
horseshit. The oligarchy has run over to
the Republican party because the
Republicans are in power and oligarchs
can purchase the deregulation of all
their industries. Elon can throw money
at Trump, and Trump will give Elon the
keys so he can tinker under the hood
with Doge and execute mass layoffs,
slash regulations, and gain access to
internal systems across 15 federal
agencies so as to halt investigations
into Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink. They
run over to the Republicans because
Trump will deregulate AI and its data
centers, expand federal contracts right
after purchasing huge amounts of stock
to enrich himself on insider trading,
and appoint corporate chills to the head
of every federal agency, so that nobody
can do anything to halt their expansion
and wealth acquisition, no matter who
they harm. That's why, Eric. And I'm not
saying they couldn't do any of that with
the Democrats. They can and have, but
they can do it 10 times more with Trump.
What else? No, Fouchy wasn't full of
[\h__\h] at all. That's the narrative that
was spun to assign a boogeyman to
distract from the mountain of
anti-science propaganda surrounding the
pandemic and vaccines. When you say
COVID was a giant lie, what the [\h__\h] are
you even saying? That viruses and
pandemics aren't real because that's
what it [\h__\h] sounds like, which would
put you on par with flat-earthers. You
talk [\h__\h] about Peter Dashik because he
upholds the true narrative of zonotic
origin that contradicts the lab leak
propaganda you support because it suits
the agenda of the oligarchs you serve. A
lot of people still haven't gotten this
memo and they whine about it in my
comment sections, but let me say it once
again for clarity. 100% of the science
supports zonotic origin and 0% of the
science supports lab leak. Lab leak is a
multi-layered propaganda campaign that
was started by Steve Bannon to redirect
anger regarding Trump's abysmal pandemic
response during his re-election
campaign. And it morphed into a bunch of
other [\h__\h] thanks to Eric's loser
baby brother and a bunch of other
frauds. I debunk absolutely all of it in
painstaking detail in this video, so
please watch it. Where are our
scientists? Where are intellectuals?
Where are people who care more about how
do I say this? glory
and immortality rather than private jet
travel.
You could not give get me to give up my
claim on immortality for private jet
travel.
I don't understand the fascination with
private jets.
They're cool. mildly
>> Eric, the only claim to immortality you
have is going down as the single biggest
douchebag in human history. Michael
Vasser had a made a point to me, as he
often does, which is really dangerous.
And he said, "When did the world's
smartest people stop caring about their
own game and their own prizes and start
focusing on the prizes of the people
pursuing wealth and status?
And he said, "Somehow when scientists
care about McLarens and Lamborghinis
that something terrible has happened."
And boy has that like a splinter in my
mind turning over. I can't get rid of
it. He's right. Scientists don't have
Lamborghinis, you [\h__\h] tool. Almost
zero scientists are exceptionally
wealthy. The average salary is barely
six figures. They are scientists because
they don't give a [\h__\h] about
Lamborghinis. They do specifically care
about doing good science and receiving
accolades from within the scientific
community. This isn't [\h__\h] buckaroo
bonsai. The physicist, neurosurgeon,
test pilot, rockstar, millionaire, alien
fighter isn't real. Tony Stark isn't
real. You say [\h__\h] like this and then
you wonder why real scientists treat you
like a loser troll. Seriously,
>> we've got to make sure that the public
intellectuals are not dominated by
billionaires. As much as I love these
guys, they're my friends.
>> I think you're right.
>> Yeah, they're smart as hell. They
wouldn't have gotten to be billionaires
otherwise, but they're always talking
their book.
Always.
Look at, you know, people are like
famous libertarians and they become
surveillance people. you know, the
>> Bill Gates, you know, is he just buying
farmland for
>> right
>> to be he wants to make sure that we have
a steady supply of of food of something.
>> Um, we've got to stop the addiction to
billionaires as the only people we trust
because at least they're rich.
>> Let's end it there. I got to wrap this
up, but I appreciate you very much. This
is very good.
>> I can't take your [\h__\h] yapping
anymore, Eric. We have to stop. The
kickback from Peter just isn't worth it.
By the way, the little gem at the end of
how we need to stop trusting
billionaires while your entire existence
is pedalling propaganda for billionaires
was just the last straw. Shut your dumb
face forever. As depressing as this can
get, I do want to offer a tiny kernel of
hope. If you scroll through the comment
section of this episode, it's almost
exclusively people [\h__\h] all over
Eric, remarking at what an insufferable,
pretentious douchebag he is. Even the
Rogan's fear that made Eric doesn't want
anything to do with him anymore. Could
the tide be turning? Could the podcast
bro space be slowly figuring out that
they're being lied to at all times? I
don't want to get ahead of myself, but
whatever we can find that nudges them in
that direction, let's be sure to keep
pressing. And finally, be sure to never
fall for Eric's crybaby reaction to
those who expose him about how we are
such awful, mean bullies that thrive on
being toxic, negative jerk faces all the
time. me especially.
>> I don't sense with either you or myself
any desire
to just
negate people. If somebody is just
determined to be horrible.
>> Yeah,
>> I don't mind commenting. That person
seems to want to be horrible. Dave Fina,
perfect example.
>> Yeah, that's the stuff. Never forget
Eric works for Peter Teal. His entire
purpose in life is to spread propaganda
on podcasts that massages the public
towards accepting Teal's agenda. He runs
Palunteer, which is a [\h__\h] nightmare.
His tech is used to carry out genocide.
His tech is being used to turn America
into an authoritarian surveillance
state. And that's just exhibit A. Teal
runs inference review where all the
Discovery Institute ass hats publish
fake papers. He is aligned with
Christian theocrats. He represents the
eradication of democracy and freedom. He
is a disgusting evil man. And if Peter
was Jabba the Hut, Eric would be this
little [\h__\h] Did you know that this
thing from Star Wars has a name? It's
Salacious Beer Crumb. That's Eric. A
shrill creature making loud noises for
scraps from his mob boss master.
That's Eric's legacy, and it sounds like
the internet has finally caught up to
this fact.
So, that's it for this installment of
Eric Weinstein plummeting towards rock
bottom. Has he gone as low as he can go?
One would think so, but he always seems
to surprise us. So, let's see what other
self-humiliation he has in store. Until
next time.